Code of Civil Procedure Section 91. Public nuisances and other wrongful acts affecting the public.
(a) removing any trustee;
(b) appointing a new trustee;
(c) vesting any property in
a trustee;
3[(cc)
directing a trustee who has been removed or a person who has ceased to be a
trustee, to deliver possession of any trust property in his possession to the
person entitled to the possession of such property];
(d) directing accounts and
inquiries;
(e) declaring what
proportion of the trust property or of the interest therein shall be allocated
to any particular object of the trust;
(f) authorizing the whole or
any part of the trust property to be let, sold, mortgaged or exchanged;
(g) settling a scheme; or
(h) granting such further or
other relief as the nature of the case may require.
(2) Save as provided by the
Religious Endowments Act, 1863 (XX of 1863), 4[or by any corresponding
law in force in 5[the territories which, immediately before the 1st
November, 1956, were comprised in Part B States]], no suit claiming any of the
reliefs specified in sub-section (1) shall be instituted in respect of any such
trust as is therein referred to except in conformity with the provisions of that
sub-section.
6[(3)
The Court may alter the original purposes of an express or constructive trust
created for public purposes of a charitable or religious nature and allow the
property or income of such trust or any portion thereof to be applied cy pres
in one or more of the following circumstances, namely :—
(a) where the original
purposes of the trust, in whole or in part,—
(i) have been, as far as may
be, fulfilled; or
(ii) cannot be carried out
at all, or cannot be carried out according to the directions given in the
instrument creating the trust or, where there is no such instrument, according
to the spirit of the trust; or
(b) where the original
purposes of the trust provide a use for a part only of the property available
by virtue of the trust; or
(c) where the property
available by virtue of the trust and other property applicable for similar purposes
can be more effectively used in conjunction with, and to that end can suitably
be made applicable to any other purpose, regard being had to the spirit of the
trust and its applicability to common purposes; or
(d) where the original
purposes, in whole or in part, were laid down by reference to an area which then
was, but has since ceased to be, a unit for such purposes; or
(e) where the original
purposes, in whole or in part, have, since they were laid down,—
(i) been adequately provided
for by other means, or
(ii) ceased, as being
useless or harmful to the community, or
(iii) ceased to be, in law,
charitable, or
(iv) ceased in any other way
to provide a suitable and effective method of using the property available by
virtue of the trust, regard being had to the spirit of the trust.]
Note:
1. Section 92 shall not
apply to any religious trust in Bihar, see Bihar Act 1 of 1951.
2. Subs. by Act 104 of 1976,
s. 31, for “consent in writing of the Advocate-General”, (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
3. Ins. by Act 66 of 1956,
s. 9.
4. Ins. by Act 2 of 1951, s.
13.
5. Subs. by the A.O. (No.
2), 1956, for “a Part B State”.
6. Ins. by Act 104 of 1976,
s. 31 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
Code of Civil Procedure Section
Simplified
Explanation:
Section
92 deals with the suit relating to the management of trust and
properties of trust. As the suit can be filed only with the leave of the Court,
it is not permissible to entertain the application under Order VII Rule 11 at
the subsequent stage. Such an application should be entertained prior to grant
of the leave by the Court.
Section
92 CPC (suit relating to management of trust) r/w Section 12 of civil courts
act. (Jurisdiction)
Insofar
as the suits under Section 92 are concerned, the District Courts and Subordinate
Courts will have concurrent jurisdiction without reference to any pecuniary limits.
A suit under Section 92 of the Code, where the value of subject-matter does not
exceed Rs. 1 lakh, cannot be filed in any Court as Section 92 confers
jurisdiction only on District Court and Subordinate Courts.
Judgment:
In Sri
Jeyarom Educational Trust & Ors. V. A.G. Syed Mohideen & Ors., (2010)
2 SCC 513 the Supreme Court held that "District courts will have
concurrent jurisdiction to Courts on which jurisdiction have been conferred by
the State by a notification under Section 92(1)".
See also:
Order VII Rule 11: Rejection of plaint.
Reference:
http://www.nja.nic.in/16%20CPC.pdf
Please
share and follow this blog for more such law related articles.
===================
No comments:
Post a Comment