22. Notice to show cause
against execution in certain cases.—(1) Where an application
for execution is made—
(a) more than 1[two
years] after the date of the decree, or
(b) against the legal
representative of a party to the decree 1[or where an application is
made for execution of a decree filed under the provisions of section 44A], 3[or]
4[(c)
against the assignee or receiver in insolvency, where the party to the decree
has been adjudged to be an insolvent,] the Court executing the decree shall
issue a notice to the person against whom execution is applied for requiring
him to show cause, on a date to be fixed, why the decree should not be executed
against him:
Provided that no such notice
shall be necessary in consequence of more than 5[two years] having elapsed
between the date of the decree and the application for execution if the
application is made within 5[two years] from the date of the last
order against the party against whom execution is applied for, made on any
previous application for execution, or in consequence of the application being
made against the legal representative of the judgment-debtor if upon a previous
application for execution against the same person the Court has ordered
execution to issue against him.
(2) Nothing in the foregoing
sub-rule shall be deemed to preclude the Court from issuing any process in
execution of a decree without issuing the notice thereby prescribed, if, for
reasons to be recorded, it considers that the issue of such notice would cause
unreasonable delay or would defeat the ends of justice.
Note: 1. Subs. by Act 104 of
1976, s. 72, for “one year” (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
2. Ins. by Act 8 of 1937, s.
3.
3. Ins. by Act 104 of 1976,
s. 72 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
4. Ins. by Act 104 of 1976,
s. 72 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
5. Subs. by s. 72, ibid.,
for “one year” (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
Explanation:
When an application is made
more than two years after the date of decree or against the legal
representatives of a party to the decree, the Court must first issue a notice
to the person against whom execution is applied for requiring him to show cause
why the decree should not be executed against him, unless the case falls within
the proviso to sub-rule 1 of Rule 22 of Order XXI, or the Court dispenses with
the notice under sub-rule (2) of the same Rule in which latter case the failure
to record any reasons is now deemed to be only an irregularity not amounting to
a defect in jurisdiction (vide the rule as amended by the Punjab High Court).
No comments:
Post a Comment