Showing posts with label Environmental Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Environmental Law. Show all posts

Friday, 10 June 2022

Ganga Action plan (GAP)

 Ganga Action plan (GAP) = Ganga Action Plan Overview

1. Ganga action plan was started in 1986 with the objective of pollution abatement from river Ganga.

2. GAP – Ganga Action Plan is a 100% centrally sponsored scheme. Under this plan, the National River Ganga basin authority was established and declared Ganga as a national river of India.

3. Ganga Action Plan was directed by Rajiv Gandhi. The authority is headed by the prime minister and chief ministers of all the states in which river Ganga flows.

4. GAP was divided into two phases. Phase-I started in 1985 and covered the then three states, Uttar Pradesh (UP), Bihar and West Bengal (WB).

5. Phase-II of GAP was launched in 1993, which covers seven states that include Uttarakhand, UP, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Delhi and Haryana.

6. In the second phase, Ganga action plan was created for all these tributaries. The national river conservation plan was started under the same program for the 2nd phase.

7. It included tributaries of Ganga as well like Yamuna, Mahananda, Gomti, Damodar.

8. The Ministry of Environment and forests (MoEF) was made in charge of the overall design and implementation of GAP.

9. Central Ganga Authority (CGA) came into existence under the Environment Protection Act 1986, headed by the Prime Minister of India.

=============

The Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act 1974

The Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act is legislated in the year

A. 1972

B. 1974 è

C. 1984

D. 1986

==============

The main feature of the Water Act is the control of pollution through a permit or “consent administration” procedure.

Discharge of effluents into water bodies was only allowed by obtaining the consent of the State Board, within restrictions it poses.

Act covers the following aspects of regulating water resources in the country:

1. To prevent and control water pollution.

2. To maintain “wholesomeness” of water, i.e. to maintain the qualities of water so that its consumption and use by living organisms is not hampered.

3. To establish State Boards for prevention and control of pollution, which gets subsumed by the Air Act, passed in 1981.

4. To empower the Boards for prevention and control of pollution.

5. To provide penalties for breaking the rules of the provisions under this Act.

6. To establish state water testing laboratories and develop its protocols.

===============

Provisions for Central, State and Joint Boards have been made under

(a) The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 è

(b) The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981

(c) The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

(d) All of the above

=============

The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972

 The Wildlife (Protection) Act was enacted in the year :

(a) 1986 (b) 1974

(c) 1994 (d) 1972 è

============

Objectives of wild life conservation

1. Protection of natural habitats of organisms through controlled exploita­tion.

2. Maintenance of rare species in protected areas such as national parks, santuries etc.,

3. Establishment of specific biosphere reserves for endangered plants and animals.

4. Protection of wild life through legislation such as banning hunting etc.,

5. Imposing specific restrictions on export of endangered plants and animals or their products.

6. Educating the public about the need to protect and preserve the environ­ment as a long range goal for the welfare of future generations.

Salient Features of Wildlife Protection Act

1. This Act provides for the protection of a listed species of animals, birds, and plants, and also for the establishment of a network of ecologically-important protected areas in the country.

2. The Act provides for the formation of wildlife advisory boards, wildlife wardens, specifies their powers and duties, etc.

3. It helped India become a party to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

4. CITES is a multilateral treaty with the objective of protecting endangered animals and plants. It is also known as the Washington Convention and was adopted as a result of a meeting of IUCN members.

5. The Act prohibited the hunting of endangered species.

6. Scheduled animals are prohibited from being traded as per the Act’s provisions.

7. The Act provides for licenses for the sale, transfer, and possession of some wildlife species.

8. It provides for the establishment of wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, etc.

9. Its provisions paved the way for the formation of the Central Zoo Authority. This is the central body responsible for the oversight of zoos in India. It was established in 1992.

10. The Act created six schedules which gave varying degrees of protection to classes of flora and fauna.

11. Schedule I and Schedule II (Part II) get absolute protection, and offences under these schedules attract the maximum penalties.

12. The schedules also include species that may be hunted.

13. The National Board for Wildlife was constituted as a statutory organization under the provisions of this Act. This is an advisory board that offers advice to the central government on issues of wildlife conservation in India. It is also the apex body to review and approve all matters related to wildlife, projects of national parks, sanctuaries, etc. The chief function of the Board is to promote the conservation and development of wildlife and forests. It is chaired by the Prime Minister.

14. The Act also provided for the establishment of the National Tiger Conservation Authority. It is a statutory body of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change with an overall supervisory and coordination part, performing capacities as given in the Act. Its mandate is to strengthen tiger conservation in India. It gives statutory authority to Project Tiger which was launched in 1973 and has put the endangered tiger on a guaranteed path of revival by protecting it from extinction.

==============


Oleum gas leak case 1986 = M C Mehta Vs Union of India

Which case resulted in the creation of the absolute liability principle?

A. Ryland v Fletcher

B. Oleum gas leak case 1986  è

C. Bhopal gas leak case

D. Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India

==========

The absolute liability principle:

The rule of absolute liability was evolved in the case of M.C. Mehta v Union of India. This was a very important landmark judgment that brought in a new rule in the history of the Indian Law. The rule held that where an enterprise is engaged in a hazardous or inherently dangerous activity and it harm results to anyone on account of an accident in the operation of such hazardous or inherently dangerous activity resulting, the enterprise is strictly and absolutely liable to compensate to all those who are affected by the accident.

What is Absolute Liability?

If an industry or enterprise is engaged in some inherently dangerous activity from which it is deriving commercial gain and that activity is capable of causing catastrophic damage then the industry officials are absolutely liable to pay compensation to the aggrieved parties. The industry cannot plead that all safety measures were taken care of by them and that there was negligence on their part. They will not be allowed any exceptions neither can they take up any defence like that of Act of God' or Act of Stranger'

In M.C. Mehta v Union of India, In the city of Delhi, there was severe leakage of oleum gas on the 4th and the 6th of December, 1985. This took place in one of the units of Shriram Foods and Fertilizers Industries belonging to the Delhi Cloth Mills Ltd. due to this, an advocate practicing in the Tis Hazari Court had died and many others were affected by the same. The action was brought through a writ petition by way of public interest litigation (PIL).

===========

Recently in which case, the rule of absolute liability was applied?

A. Visakhapatnam gas leak case: LG Polymers

B. M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India ===>

C. Naresh Dutt Tyagi v State of UP

D. Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India

========


Indian Council for Enviro-legal Action Vs Union of India

 In which of the following did the court accept the precautionary principle along with the polluter pays principle as part of the legal system?

a. Vellore Citizens welfare forum vs Union of India

b. M.C.Mehta Vs Kamal Nath

c. Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs Union of India

d. Indian Council for Enviro-legal Action Vs Union of India è

===========

Indian Council for Enviro-legal Action Vs Union of India

In this case, the Principle of “Polluter Pays” was expressly implemented, as the Court ruled that, under Section 3 and Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Court has the authority to undertake steps to put such a rule into effect. It was introduced under Principle 16 of the Rio Summit of 1992 which specified that the polluter must principally pay for the pollution charges.

There is also a debate about whether only a civil action against the polluter is satisfactory or whether there is a necessity to make the polluters criminally liable as well. The provisions of Sections 268 and 290 of the Indian Penal Code were already being utilized to declare the accused criminally responsible for public nuisance in relation to environmental disturbance, which was way before the adoption of the Stockholm Declaration in 1972. Following the Stockholm Declaration, the Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act of 1974, and the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act of 1981 contain the provisions for the initiation of criminal proceedings against such polluters.

Basically, the court implemented the concept of polluters pay, which implies, as per the court, that if an activity carried out, is of a harmful nature, then the individuals conducting these very activities will be required to compensate to make up for the damage caused to any other person irrespective of whether appropriate precautionary measures were taken or not while carrying out such an activity.

=============

A.P. Pollution Control Board v M.V. Nayudu

 “In order to ensure that there is neither damage to the environment nor to the ecology and at the same time ensuring sustainable development it can refer scientific and technical aspects for investigating and opinion to statutory expert bodies having a combination of both judicial technical expertise in such matter”, this was held in –

a. A.P. Pollution Control Board v M.V. Nayudu è

b. Vellore Citizen’s Welfare Forum V Union of India

c. M.C. Mehta V Kamal Nath

d. Narmada Bachao Andolan v Union of India

================

Judgement

The Court held that the authorities could not grant a NOC to set up industries within 10 K.M.

The Court directed the Government of Andhra Pradesh to identify other industries within 10 Km of the reservoirs and take appropriate action to prevent pollution to the drinking water in these two reservoirs.

The Court held that the Board shall not permit any polluting industry within 10 Km area and asked them to submit a report within four months with respect to the industries existing within 10 Km of reservoirs that potentially caused pollution.

The Court also observed that the principle of promissory estoppels did not apply to the present case.

The Court recommended the Law Commission of India to consider a review of the environmental laws existing in the country.

The Court also recommended the need for establishing environmental courts consisting of experts in environmental law and members of the Judiciary.

Analysis and Conclusion

The right to sustainable development is declared as an inalienable human right in the Declaration on the Right to Development, 1986 by the UN General Assembly.

The 1992 Rio Conference declared, “Human beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable development.”  

Thus, access to drinking water is an essential element for life, and it is the duty of the state under Article 21 to provide clean drinking water to its citizens.

In Narmada Bachao Andolan vs Union of India, Kirpal J observed, “Water is the basic need for the survival of human beings and is part of the right of life and human rights as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.”

The right to a healthy environment, along with the right to sustainable development, must be balanced.

As observed by the Supreme Court in this case, there is a need to set up environmental courts in order to ensure speedy disposal of environment litigations.

It is also necessary to take measures that will help reduce environmental degradation to create specific criteria for such hazardous industries.

==============


Church of God (Gospel) in India-Vs.-K.K.R. Majestic

“No religious practices should disturb peace of society” was held in the case of _____.

(a) Vellore Citizen Forum Case

(b) Ganga Pollution Case

(c) Church of God (Gospel) in India-Vs.-K.K.R. Majestic è

(d) Taj Trapezium Case.

Loudspeaker case 1999

This case is related to the noise pollution.

The appellant, a minority institution was in the practice of using musical instruments such as drum set, triple ganga, guitar etc. The respondent welfare Association filed a Criminal O.P before the High Court of Madras for a direction to the authorities [Superintendent of Police] to take action on the basis of the letter issued by the Joint Chief Environment Engineer of the TMPCB.

In High Court it was contended by the Church that the petition was filed with an oblique motive in order to prevent a religious minority institution from pursuing its religious activities and the Court cannot issue any directions to prevent the church from practicing its religious beliefs. The High Court balanced the act by giving directions to the religious minority institution to bring down the noise level by keeping the speakers at a lower level.

But the Court held that 'undisputedly no religion prescribed that prayers should be performed by disturbing the peace of other nor does it preach that they should be through voice-amplifiers or beating of drums.

In our view, in a civilized society in the name of religion, activities which disturb old, infirm persons, students or children having their sleep in the early hours or during day time or other persons carrying on other activities cannot be permitted..'.

The Court while adjudicating the appeal observed that in the present case, the contention with regard to the right under Art. 25 or Art. 26 of the Constitution which are subject to 'public order, morality and health' are not required to be dealt with in detail mainly because.. no religion prescribes or preaches that prayers are required to be performed through voice amplifiers or by beating of drums. In any case, if there is such practice, it should not adversely affect the rights of others including that of being not disturbed in their activities.

===========

SMOG

 Which of the following pollutants are responsible for the cause of SMOG?

A. Incinerators

B. emission from vehicles

C. Both A & B è

D. Ozone gas

===========

Smog is air pollution that reduces visibility.

The term "smog" was first used in the early 1900s to describe a mix of smoke and fog.

The smoke usually came from burning coal.

Smog was common in industrial areas, and remains a familiar sight in cities today.

Today, most of the smog we see is photochemical smog.

======


Radiation pollution

Which among the following can cause radiation pollution?

A. Uranium è

B. Ozone

C. Sulphur

D. Methane

======


The National Environmental Tribunal Act

 The National Environmental Tribunal Act was passed in :

(a) 1992

(b) 1995 è

(c) 1990

(d) 1994

Explanation

In 1995, the Central Government established the National Environment Tribunal (through the National Environment Tribunal Act 1995) to provide for strict liability for damage arising out of accidents caused from the handling of hazardous substances.

============


Kyoto Protocol 1997

Green House Conference is also known

(a) Kyoto Conference è

(b) Stockholm Conference

(c) The Montreal Protocol

(d) All of the above.

==========

Kyoto Protocol 1997 = The Kyoto Protocol was an international treaty which extended the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change that commits state parties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, based on the scientific consensus that global warming is occurring and that human-made CO₂ emissions are driving it.

============

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was held in _____.

(a) 1993

(b) 1994

(c) 1997 è Kyoto Protocol

(d) 1992

==========

The Kyoto Protocol of 1997 is a part of the Convention on Climate Change adopted at -----------

A. China

B. USA

C. Italy

D. Japan è

============

Kyoto Protocol was adopted in the year ______.

(a) 1996

(b) 1997 è

(c) 1998

(d) 1999

Explanation:

The Kyoto Protocol was adopted on 11 December 1997.

Owing to a complex ratification process, it entered into force on 16 February 2005.

Currently, there are 192 Parties to the Kyoto Protocol.

============

Kyoto protocol is related to _____________ .

(a) Ozone depletion

(b) Global warming è

(c) Acid rain

(d) Climate change

Explanation:

The Kyoto Protocol is an international treaty adopted in 1997 that aimed to reduce the emission of gases that contribute to global warming. The protocol called for reducing the emissions of six greenhouse gases in 41 countries plus the European Union to 5.2 percent below 1990 levels.

As of June 2013, there are 192 parties to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which aims to combat global warming.

 This total includes 191 states (189 United Nations member states as well as the Cook Islands and Niue) and one supranational union (the European Union).

On December 11, 1997, delegates from more than 150 countries signed the Kyoto Protocol, an agreement to lower the amount of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere.

Human activities release greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, which have been proven to cause climate change.

==============

39. The concept of ‘carbon credit’ originated from which one of the following?

(a) Kyoto Protocol

(b) Earth Summit

c) Montreal protocol

d) G-8 summit

Carbon Credit:

According to the Corporate Credit Institute, a carbon credit is a tradable permit or certificate that provides the holder of the credit the right to emit one ton of carbon dioxide or an equivalent of another greenhouse gas.

The concept of carbon credits emerged during the Kyoto Protocol discussions and is an integral part of today's environmental economics.

Carbon credits basically refer to certificates giving the beholder the right to emit 1 tonne of carbon dioxide or its equivalent.

Carbon credits are measurable, verifiable emission reductions from certified climate action projects. These projects reduce, remove or avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

In theory, carbon offsets help balance your carbon footprint by funding environmental projects that reduce greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

One carbon offset credit supposedly equals one metric ton of carbon dioxide, or a comparable amount of other greenhouse gases, removed from the air.

==========

Consider the following statements:

i) Kyoto Protocol came into force in year 2005.

(ii) Kyoto protocol primarily deals vis reducing overall green house missions

iii) Carbon dioxide is five times more effective as a greenhouse gas than methane.

Which of the above statements is/are correct

(a) (i), and (ii) è

(b) (ii) and (iii)

(c) (i) only

(d) (iii) only.

Methane is more than 25 times as potent as carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere.

===========


Environment Protection Act 1986

What is the objective of the Environment Protection Act 1986?

a) To implement decisions taken at the UN Conferences on Human Environment in Stockholm, 1972

b) To take appropriate steps in protection and improvement of human environment.

c) To prevent hazards to human being, living creatures, plans and property.

d) All of the above è

Explanation:

The Act covers all forms of pollution; air, water, soil and noise. It provides the safe standards for the presence of various pollutants in the environment.

It prohibits the use of hazardous material unless prior permission is taken from the Central Government.

The objective of EPA is to protect and improve the environment and environmental conditions.

It also implements the decisions made at the UN Conference on Human Environment that was held in Stockholm in the year 1972, to take strict actions against all those who harm the environment.

The EPA empowers the Centre to “take all such measures as it deems necessary” in the domain of environmental protection.

Under the law, it can coordinate and execute nationwide programmes and plans to further environmental protection.

It can mandate environmental quality standards, particularly those concerning the emission or discharge of environmental pollutants.

This law can impose restrictions on the location of industries.

The law gives the government the power of entry for examination, testing of equipment and other purposes and power to analyse the sample of air, water, soil or any other substance from any place.

The EPA explicitly bars the discharge of environmental pollutants in excess of prescribed regulatory standards.

There is also in place a specific provision for handling hazardous substances, which is prohibited unless in compliance with regulatory requirements.

The Act empowers any person, apart from authorised government officers, to file a complaint in a court regarding any contravention of the provisions of the Act.

The chief aims and objectives of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 are listed below.

1) Implementing the decisions made at the United Nations Conference on Human Environment held in Stockholm.

2) Creation of a government authority to regulate industry that can issue direct orders including closure orders.

3) Coordinating activities of different agencies that are operating under the existing laws.

4) Enacting regular laws for the protection of the environment.

5) Imposing punishments and penalties on those who endanger the environment, safety and health. For each failure or contravention, the punishment includes a prison term of up to five years or a fine of up to Rs. 1 lakh, or both. This can also be extended for up to seven years in cases.

6) Engaging in the sustainable development of the environment.

7) Attaining protection of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

==============

The term Environment is defined under section _ of the Environment Protection Act 1986:

(a) 2(a) è

(b) 2(b)

(c) 2(aa)

(d) 2(c)

Definition of environment:

Environment includes water, air and land and the inter-relationship which exists among and between water, air and land, and human beings, other living creatures, plants, micro-organism and property;

==============

The Environment Protection Act was enacted in the year ______________ .

(a) 1988 (b) 1986 è

(c) 1991 (d) 1987

============

The Indian Parliament enacted the Environment Protection Act in the year ______.

(a) 1981 (b) 1986 è

(c) 1984 (d) 1982

=========

Which Section defines 'Environment Pollutant' under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986?

A. Sec. 2(a)

B. Sec.2(b) è

C. Sec.2(c)

D. Sec.2(d)

Environmental pollutant means any solid, liquid or gaseous substance present in such concentration as may be, or tend to be, injurious to environment;

===============

Environment Protection Act is legislated in

A. 1974

B. 1972

C. 1986 ==>

D. 1984

===============

Environment has been defined as_________under the Environment Protection Act, 1986 –

a. ‘Environment’ includes water, air, land and the inter-relationship that exists between water, air and land and other human beings, other living beings, plants, micro-organisms and property è

b. ‘Environment’ includes water, air and land and the inter-relationship which exists between water, air and land and other human beings.

c. ‘Environment’ includes water, air and land and the inter-relationship with one another

d. ‘Environment’ includes water, air and land and human beings, other living creatures, plants, microorganisms and property.

=============

As per Sec. 2 (a) of The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Environment refers to:

a. water, air and land;

b. the inter- relationship which exists among and between water, air and land, and human beings, è

c. other living creatures, plants, micro-organism and property;

d. Animals & plants

=============

Central Ganga Authority (CGA) came into existence under the Environment Protection Act 1986, headed by the Prime Minister of India.

=====================

The Environment Protection Act, 1986 passed in May 1986, it came in to force on:

a. 1 April 1986

b. 1 July 1986

c. 19 November 1986 è

d. 1 January 1987

===========

The definition of ‘environmental pollution’ under the Environment (Protection Act) is:

(a) Any pollution of air, water and soil

(b) The presence of any solid, liquid or gaseous substance in the environment that causes injuries to man

(c) The presence in the environment of any environmental pollution è

(d) Any pollution in land, sea and air.

As per Section 2(c) of the Environment (Protection Act), 1986 ‘environmental pollution’ means the presence in the environment of any environmental pollutant;

=============

In the light of definition of “Environment pollutant” Environment Protection Act, 1986, which one of the following statements is not correct:

(a) Environment pollutant is any substance or preparation which may, by reason of its chemical or physio-chemical properties or handling is liable to cause harm

(b) Environmental pollutant is any solid, liquid or gaseous substance present in such concentration as may be or tend to be injurious to environment

(c) Environment pollutant is a substance, which is poisonous, hazardous and injurious to human safety

(d) Environment pollutant is a substance which is chemically explosive contagious, destructive or non-reactive and non-useful for the living being on earth è=

===========


Water-shed

Which one of the conference is regarded as “Water Shed” in the field of Environment that enables the International community and institutions to work without being bothered by the principle of State Sovereignty?

(a) Stockholm Conference

(b) Bali Conference

(c) Copenhagen Conference è

(d) Rio Conference.

Copenhagen Conference

The 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference, commonly known as the Copenhagen Summit, was held at the Bella Center in Copenhagen, Denmark, between 7 and 18 December.

The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference raised climate change policy to the highest political level.

The Obama-BASIC meeting was a watershed. It saved Copenhagen from a complete collapse and also marked the emergence of the BASIC quartet as a major force in international climate policy diplomacy.

Bali Conference

The 2007 United Nations Climate Change Conference took place at the Bali International Conference Centre, Nusa Dua, in Bali, Indonesia, between December 3 and December 15, 2007.

Representatives from over 180 countries attended, together with observers from intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations.

A NUMBER OF BODIES (e.g., those that address technical matters and those that oversee implementation of the Convention and the Kyoto Protocol) meet during the two-week official conference period.

 There were other significant outcomes as well, particularly those related to adaptation and avoided deforestation, which are important for the sustainable development agenda.

==============


Vellore Citizens Case

The concept of Sustainable development was firstly adopted by the Indian Judiciary In

A. Ganga Pollution Case

B. Taj Mahal Pollution Case

C. Vellore Citizens Case è

D. Coca Cola Case

Explanation:

Vellore Citizens Case

In the case of Vellore Citizen Welfare Forum v. Union of Indiathe doctrine of Sustainable Development was implemented for the first time by the Supreme Court.

Sustainable Development and Indian Judiciary: Right to wholesome environment is a fundamental right protected under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The Petition was filed against the water pollution caused due to excessive release of pollutants by the tanneries and other industries in the State of Tamil Nadu into the river Palar.

It is known as Tamilnadu tanneries case.

The court in Vellore case, took an absolutist approach, i.e. the court held that once an activity is considered dangerous to the environment, it should be stopped immediately.

Ganga Pollution Case =

It is also M C Mehta Vs Union of India Case. Mehta I and Mehta II

Ganga receives large amounts of toxic waste from the city´s domestic and industrial sectors, particularly the leather tanneries of Kanpur.

In 1985, M.C. Mehta filed a writ petition in the nature of mandamus to prevent these leather tanneries from disposing off domestic and industrial waste and effluents in the Ganga river. This writ petition was bifurcated by the Supreme Court into two parts known as Mehta I and Mehta II.

Taj Mahal Pollution Case = The Taj Mahal Case, also known as the Taj Trapezium Case, was fought between M.C. Mehta and the Union of India. He filed a writ petition in 1986.

Coca Cola Case = Meanwhile, according to the Complaint, Coca-Cola is the world's leading plastic waste producer, generating 2.9 million tons of plastic waste per year. It uses about 200,000 plastic bottles per minute, amounting to about one-fifth of the world's polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle output.

=============


Sustainable Development

What’s Rio+20 Conference, often mentioned in the news?

(a) It is the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development è

(b) It is a Ministerial Meeting of the World Trade Organisation

(c) It is a Conference of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change

(d) It is a Conference of the Member Countries of the Convention on Biological Diversity

Explanation:

Rio+20

The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, also known as Rio 2012, Rio+20, or Earth Summit 2012 was the third international conference on sustainable development aimed at reconciling the economic and environmental goals of the global community.

It is the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development.

Twenty years after the 1992 'Earth Summit' in Rio de Janeiro, the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio (also known as Rio+20) resulted in a document containing clear and practical steps for the implementation of sustainable development.

Key principles:

• Principle 5: The eradication of poverty as an indispensable requirement of sustainable development;

• Principle 6: Calls for attention to the special situation and needs of developing countries, particularly the least developed and those most environmentally vulnerable.

Principle 7 : States need to cooperate to protect and restore the health and integrity of the Earth’s ecosystems with developed countries holding a particular responsibility common but differentiated responsibility

• Principle 8 : Cooperation by states to reduce and eliminate unsustainable patterns of production and consumption.

• Principle 16: the polluter should, in principle, bear the cost of pollution;

• Principle 17: The precautionary approach;

• The definition of participation as the best way to handle environmental matters is contained in Principle 10.

==================

What was the title of the Rio-20 declaration?

(a) The future we went

(b) The future we seek è

(c) The future we have

(d) The future we see

(e) None of these.

==========

The concept of 'Sustainable Development' was firstly introduced in-

A. Rio Declaration

B. Stockholm Declaration

C. Brundtland Report è

D. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED)

Explanation:

The Brundtland Report, published in 1987 by the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, coined the term "sustainable development" and defined it as "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

============

The basic idea behind 'Sustainable Development' is

A. Development at all cost

B. Environmental protection at all cost

C. Liberalisation, Privatisation, Globalisation (LPG) at all cost

D. Environment & Development should go hand in hand. è

==========

Which among the following is false about ‘the polluter pays principle’?

a. It finds its mention in Principle 16 of the Rio Declaration

b. It provides that producers of goods or other items should bear the financial and practical responsibility of preventing or remedying any pollution caused by their activity

c. It exposes the polluter to two fold liability, namely compensation to the victim of pollution and ecological restoration

d. This principle was to conceal the trade secrets of the manufacturing unit è

===========

Which of the following is an essential of the Polluter Pays Principle?

A. Duty to anticipate environmental degradation

B. Duty to take care

C. Duty to attack environmental pollution

D. All of the above è

===========