Showing posts with label Criminal Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Criminal Law. Show all posts

Saturday 11 June 2022

Dowry MCQ Part 4

 According to section 498A of IPC any cruelty for dowry to a woman by the husband or his relatives is

a) a non-bailable offence with up to three years jail and fine

b) a bailable offence with up to three years jail and fine

c) an offence with fine up to 5 thousand rupees

d) a non bailable offence with up to seven years jail and fine

============

Punishment for Dowry Death is

A. Death Punishment

B. Imprisonment not less than 7 years and may extend to life

C. Imprisonment upto 10 years and fine upto Rs. 50,000/-

D. No imprisonment, only fine.

===========

Which Court shall try an offence under Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 if the offence is committed in Mumbai?

A. Judicial Magistrate First Class

B. Metropolitan Magistrate

C. High Court

D. Family Court

===========

 

Dowry MCQ Part 3

 Dowry Prohibition Officer is appointed by :

(a) The State Government (b) The District Judge

(c) The Chief Justice of High Court (d) The Chief Justice of Supreme Court

===========

Who ever commits Dowry death shall be punished with :

(a) Five year rigorous imprisonment

(b) Life imprisonment

(c) Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for life

(d) Only fine

============

As per the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, when any person is prosecuted for taking or abetting the taking of dowry then the burden of proving that he/she has not committed the offence lies with whom ?

A.The person who is being prosecuted

B.The local counselor

C.The marriage registrar

D.All the above

===========

According to the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961, what is the punishment for giving or taking or demanding or accepting dowry?

a) Up to 5 thousand rupees fine

b) Up to six months imprisonment and / or up to 5 thousand rupees fine

c) Up to three months punishment and/or up to one thousand rupees fine

d) Up to one year punishment and/or up to ten thousand rupees fine

===========

Dowry MCQ Part 2

 The term Dowry is defined in Section ____ of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

(a) 3 (b) 2

(c) 4 (d) 5

===========

Dowry means any _______.

(a) Property (b) Valuable Security (c) Both (a) and (b) (d) None of the above

==========

Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, presumes dowry death of a woman ?

(a) Sec. 113-A (b) Sec. 113-B

(c) Sec. 112 (d) Sec. 114

==============

Section 113-A of the Evidence Act deals with ______.

(a) Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman

(b) Presumption as to dowry death

(c) Presumption as to legitimacy of child

(d) None of the above

================

According to Section 304 B, IPC, where the death of woman is caused by any burns or Bodily injury under abnormal circumstances within _____ years of a marriage such death is called dowry death.

(a) Five years (b) Seven years

(c) Ten years (d) None of above

=============

Indian Parliament has passed the Dowry Prohibition Act, in the year ______.

(a) 1860 (b) 1961

(c) 1923 (d) 1947

==========

Which of the following is an offence under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code ?

(a) Dowry death (b) Giving dowry

(c) Taking dowry (d) All of the above

=============

____ essential ingredients have to be established before the offence under S. 304 B can be established as to dowry death.

(a) Two (b) One

(c) Three (d) Four

===========

Dowry MCQ Part 1

In special circumstances, the court can impose a sentence of imprisonment for up to ________ months for the offence of offering dowry through advertisement:

A. 6 months B. 8 months

C. 7 months D. 10 months

==============

Section ______ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 defines the word ‘Dowry’.

(a) Section 2 (b) Section 3

(c) Section 4 (d) None of above

============

Penalty for taking dowry under Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, is

(a) Imprisonment of 5 years and fine from 15,000.

(b) Life imprisonment.

(c) Only fine upto 1 lakh.

(d) None of the above.

==============

Section 304 B of the Indian Penal Code deals with dowry deaths added by

(a) Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1983.

(b) Amendment Act, 1983.

(c) The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983.

(d) None of the above.

Note: It is Amendment Act, 1986. Dowry prohibition Act (Amendment Act, 1986 (43 of 1986) with effect from November 19,1986.

=============

Sexual Harassment at Workplace MCQ Part 4

Sexual harassment of women at working place has been included in the conduct rules after the judgement of Supreme Court in :

(a) Indra Sawhney vs. U.O.I. (b) Vishakha vs. State of Rajasthan

(c) Sheela Barse vs. U.O.I. (d) Shahabano’s case

============

“Chairperson” under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013 means?

(a) Chairman of Parliamentary Committee on Women

(b) Minister of Women and Child Development

(c) Chairperson of National Women’s Commission

(d) Chairperson of the Local Complaints Committee

===============

Which among the following is a “sexual harassment” as defined under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013?

(a) physical contact and advances

(b) a demand or request for sexual favours

(c) showing pornography

(d) All the above

============

Which among the following constitutes “sexual harassment” according to the Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013?

a) Unwelcome physical contact and advances, or unwelcome sexually colored remarks

b) Trafficking

c) Acid attack

=============

Can any person with information about a sexual harassment incident file a complaint to the Complaints Committee?

a) Yes, only with written consent of the complainant

b) Yes, even without written consent of the complainant

c) No

===========

Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 came into force on?

(a) 22 April 2013

(b) 9 December 2013

(c) 21 August 2014

(d) 22 January 2015

===========

Sexual Harassment at Workplace MCQ Part 3

Which of the following landmark cases pointed out to the Supreme Court through a letter, which was treated as PIL, that the guidelines issued in Vishakha's case were not being implemented in the establishments?

A. Medha Kotwal Lele's Case

B. Meghna Kotwal Lele's case

C. Medha Patkar case

D. None of the above

===========

Which of the following may amount to sexual harassment under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013?

(a) implied or explicit promise of preferential treatment in her employment

(b) implied or explicit threat of detrimental treatment in her employment

(c) humiliating treatment likely to affect her health or safety

(d) All the above

==============

Which of the following can provide redressal in case a female domestic worker files a sexual harassment complaint against her employer?

a) Women’s Cell

b) Internal Complaints Committee

c) Local Complaints Committee

==============

“Employee” under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013 means?

(a) regular employee

(b) temporary employee

(c) adhoc/daily wage employee

(d) All the above

===========

Which among the following does not come under the meaning “workplace” under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013?

(a) any private sector organisation

(b) hospitals or nursing homes

(c) any sports institute, stadium, sports complex

(d) None of these

============

What is the purpose of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013?

(a) provide protection against sexual harassment of women at workplace

(b) prevention and redressal of complaints of sexual harassment

(c) Both a and b above

(d) None of these

==============

Sexual Harassment at Workplace MCQ Part 2

Vishakha and others V. State of Rajasthan deals with :

(a) Child Marriage (b) Sexual Harassment

(c) Bonded Labour (d) None of the above

===========

Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013 received the assent of the President on?

(a) 8 March 2013

(b) 22 April 2013

(c) 8 December 2012

(d) 22 March 2013

=============

Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 applies to

a) women b) men

c) both men and women

===========

Every offence under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013 shall be?

(a) non-bailable

(b) cognizable

(c) bailable

(d) non-cognizable

==============

Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 applies to

a) Only organized sector

b) Only unorganized sector

c) Both organized and unorganized sectors

=============

Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013 is Act ___ of 2013?

(a) 14 (b) 37

(c) 32 (d) 9

===========

Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 mandates every organization to have a committee to redress sexual harassment complaints filed by women employees. The committee is called

a) Women’s Cell

b) Internal Complaints Committee

c) Local Complaints Committee

=============

Sexual Harassment at Workplace MCQ Part 1

Vishaka and other Vs. State of Rajasthan deals with _____.

(a) Rape (b) Sexual harassment at work place

(c) Bigamy (d) Dowry

==========

__________ provides protection to Women from sexual harassment at all workplaces both in public and private sector, whether organised or unorganised.

(a) Special Marriage Act

(b) National Commission for Women Act

(c) Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act

(d) All of the above

============

Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 applies to

a) the whole of India

b) the whole of India except Jammu and Kashmir

c) the whole of India except north-eastern states

d) the whole of India except union territories

==============

Section 4 of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013 deals with?

(a) Complaint of sexual harassment

(b) Inquiry into complaint.

(c) Constitution of Internal Committee

(d) Prohibition of publication or making known contents of complaint and inquiry proceedings

============

Where the employer fails to constitute an Internal Committee as provided under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013, he/she shall be punishable with fine which may extend to?

(a) Rs. 25,000/-

(b) Rs.10,000/-

(c) Rs.50,000/- if previously convicted punishment twice the earlier punishment

(d) Rs.1 Lakh

=============

In ______, the Supreme Court has emphasised the need for an effective legislation in India to curb sexual harassment of working women and laid down number of guidelines to that effect.

(a) Vishaka Vs. State of Rajasthan

(b) Apparel Export Promotion Council Vs. A.K. Chopra

(c) Both (a) and (b)

(d) None of above

===========

Friday 10 June 2022

Infanticide

 Infanticide

Infanticide is a general term for the murder of a child aged less than 1 year, and filicide is used when the perpetrator is the parent, but neonaticide is used to refer to deliberate killing of a child up to 24 h of age by his or her parent.

William Bentinck (1828-1835): He was the Governor-General of India that banned female infanticide. He declared it as a punishable crime. The practice of female infanticide was found in western parts of India.

Provisions of IPC for infanticide:

In India, the offence of infanticide or the killing of an infant is charged as murder and is therefore equivalent to conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Section 315 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, relates to an act done with the intent to prevent child being born alive or to cause it to die after birth'. According to this section, an act done by a person with the intention of preventing a child from being alive when he/she is born or causing it die after he/she was born alive, causes the child to die before or after birth, will be punished for a term of imprisonment extending to ten years, or will be charged with fine, or both. Such act, when committed, does not include an act done to save the life of a pregnant woman, that is an act done in good faith.

Section 318 of IPC: This section intends to preventing infanticide. It is directed towards a person who disposing of the body of a child upon his/her birth.

The properties of this section are:

a. Secret burying or in any way disposing of the dead body of an infant

b. The fact whether the child dies before, during or after the birth is not required.

c. The person disposing the body of a child should have an intention to conceal the birth of that child.

Abandonment of an infant by a parent or a person assigned the care of a child, with the intention to fully abandon that child, leads to an offence under Section 317 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. A punishment under this section is described as a term of imprisonment for seven years, or with fine, or both.

Sec. 312 = Causing Miscarriage (Volutarily)

Sec. 313 = Causing Miscarriage without woman’s consent

Sec. 314 = Death caused by act done with intent to cause miscarriage.

Sec. 315 = Act done with intent to prevent child being born alive or to cause it to die after birth.

Sec. 316 = Causing death of quick unborn child by act amounting to culpable homicide.

Sec. 317 = Exposure and abandonment of child under twelve years, by parent or person having care of it.

Sec. 318 = Concealment of birth by secret disposal of dead body.

================

Which of the following enactment declared infanticide equal to murder?

(a) Criminal Procedure Code

(b) Indian Penal Code è

(c) Immoral Trafficking Act

(d) None of the above.

================

Which of the following is not a gender-based violence?

A. Prostitution

B. Female Infanticide

C. Sex-selective Abortion

D. Culpable homicide è

Section 304 of IPC provides for culpable homicide

============

Sections 312 to 318 of the IPC deal with offences of ______.

(a) Causing of miscarriage

(b) Unborn children

(c) Exposure of infants

(d) All the above è

============

Causing miscarriage without women’s consent is punishable under ________ of IPC?

(a) Section 312 (b) Section 313 è

(c) Section 316 (d) Section 320

============

Section 312 of IPC deals with:

(a) Rape (b) Causing Miscarriage è

(c) Bigamy (d) Adultery

============

What is the meaning of expression ‘woman being quick with child’ under section 312 IPC?

A. Woman being in First trimester of pregnancy

B. Woman after third month of pregnancy è

C. Both A and B

D. None of above

=================================================

Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987

 Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987

Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987 is a law enacted by Government of Rajasthan in 1987. It became an Act of the Parliament of India with the enactment of The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987 in 1988. The Act seeks to prevent sati, the voluntary or forced burning or burying alive of a widow, and to prohibit glorification of this action through the observance of any ceremony, participation in any procession, creation of a financial trust, construction of a temple, or any actions to commemorate or honor the memory of a widow who committed sati.

Sati was first banned under Bengal Sati Regulation, 1829.

====================

When prosecution for an offence under Section 4 of Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987 takes place, the burden of proof of not having committed the offence lies on whom of the following:

A. The State

B. The Accused

C. In-laws of the deceased woman

D. Witness è

=================

If you want a detailed blog explaining the Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987 and the Bengal Sati Regulation, 1829 and rules made under these Acts then please comment below.

Thursday 28 April 2022

Salient features of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961

The practice of dowry has to be examined in the broader context of the devalued status of women. Parents are often compelled to pay dowry to ensure the security and happiness of their daughter in her matrimonial home.

Dowry Prohibition Act, Indian law, enacted on May 1, 1961, intended to prevent the giving or receiving of a dowry.

Amendments to the original Dowry Prohibition Act also established minimum and maximum punishments for giving and receiving dowry and created a penalty for demanding dowry or advertising offers of money or property in connection with a marriage. The Indian Penal Code was also modified in 1983 to establish specific crimes of dowry-related cruelty, dowry death, and abetment of suicide. These enactments punished violence against women by their husbands or their relatives when proof of dowry demands or dowry harassment could be shown.

The definition of dowry in the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 is given in Section 2 as follows:

2. Definition of “dowry”.—In this Act, “dowry” means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly—

(a) by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage; or

(b) by the parents of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person;

at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties, but does not include dower or mahr in the case of persons to whom the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) applies.

Dowry does not include dower or mahr in the case of Shariyat laws.

The definition of the dowry includes the demand for any property before marriage, at the time of marriage, or even after the marriage from one party of marriage to the other party. Such demand should be in connection with the marriage. This demand shall be fulfilled by the party of the marriage, or parents of the party of the marriage, or any other related person of the party of the marriage.

If the husband demanded an amount of Rs 50,000 by way of dowry some days after the marriage from the wife’s father and in the event of her not being able to give that amount was subjected to torture, it would mean that the amount was demanded in connection with the marriage and it was a demand of dowry even though it was demanded after marriage.

The Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 does not bar the traditional giving of presents at or about the time of a wedding. Thus such presents or dowry given by the parents is therefore not at all within the definition of the statute. But it is provided that such gifts must not be demanded, they must be given voluntarily.

The Act provides for the penalty for taking dowry and abetting to take dowry. Such a person may get a punishment of imprisonment not less than five years and he has to pay a fine of at least 15,000 or value equal to such dowry demanded, whichever the more. Such punishment is provided in Section 3 of the Act.

The Act also makes agreements of giving and taking dowry void by Section 5.

Section 6 of the Act provides for the transfer of the property received in the name of dowry to the woman within three months from the date of its receipt. Such transfer in the name of the woman will be beneficial to her and her children. If the receiver of the dowry fails to transfer such property to the concerned woman then an amount equal to the value of the property may be recovered from him.

Every offence under the Act is non-bailable and non-compoundable.

The Act empowers the State Government to appoint the Dowry Prohibition Officer and to make rules for carrying purpose of the Act. Also, Central Government is empowered to make rules for the implementation of the Act.

 

Read More

References:

1) The National Commission for Women Recommendations and suggestions on Amendments to the DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961

2) Dowry Prohibition Act

3) Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961

Wednesday 27 April 2022

Bigamy in India:

Meaning:

Marriage has been defined as a pure sacrament, particularly in our Indian culture a bond that joins two lives together till the end of their lives, unlike in other countries where entering into a marriage is a contract.

If a certain person in a marital bond cheats with the other person and enters into a new bond of marriage during the lifetime of the other partner, doing this is also known as committing the offence of Bigamy, the sole reason being it is immoral on the part of the first partner to start a new life at the expense of happiness and peace of the previous partner in marriage.

The second marriage while the first marriage is in subsistence is called Bigamy. Bigamy, in simple words, means a person marries for the second time while his first marriage is in subsistence.

The bigamy law is applicable to Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, Sikhs, Parsis, and Christians [except Muslims].

Position in society:

In a case, where the husband or the wife is alive then, the second marriage contracted by a person is not legal and does not hold any validity in the eyes of law, i.e. it is termed to be a void marriage. The position of bigamy in India is certainly mentioned in the law but the practice is still very common and hence the contrast between the law and social practice results in the second wives not having enough protection.

Women in the second marriage are cheated on and are not provided with much protection under Indian laws. There is no legal recognition given to second wives. Nevertheless, the victims of bigamy can still approach the Courts for claiming maintenance. The second wife is entitled to maintenance, she is not entitled to property rights.

Legal provisions;

The key law forestalling Bigamy in India is the Indian Penal Code yet in the event that personal laws do not explicitly specify Punishment for Bigamy or illegalize Bigamy, at that point any person can’t be indicted for the offense of bigamy. Bigamy is prohibited in India under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code. The law expresses that, whoever marries another person in the lifetime of the existing spouse, such marriage by reason of its occurring during the lifetime of such husband or wife, should be viewed as void and should be punished for such offense. If any person marries more than once during the life of his first spouse, he/she should be punished with imprisonment which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to a fine.

Section 494 of the IPC provides about “Bigamy” as thus “Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries again in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine”.

Bigamy in India is a non-cognizable offence. It is bailable and compoundable when the permission of the Court is granted if the offence is committed under section 494 of the IPC. The punishment for bigamy is imprisonment, of a maximum of 7 years or a fine or in some cases, both. In case the person charged with bigamy has performed the second marriage by concealing the fact of the first marriage, then he shall be punished with imprisonment of up to 10 years or a fine or both. Such offence under section 495 is not compoundable.

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955- As per the Section 17 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, if a person considered to be a Hindu under the Act, marries another person in the existence of his/her first marriage, i.e, while the first husband or wife is alive, then that person shall be punished under the Indian Penal Code. Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 states that the children born from a bigamous relationship shall be held perfectly valid. But there is no legal recognition for the second wife, but she may have a chance of maintenance under the Act.

Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986- Under this Act, unlike other religions, there are no particular or specific provisions for bigamy. A Muslim man has a right to marry twice, thrice, or four times if he is able to treat and respect all of his wives in an equal manner. In case he fails to do so, then he is liable.

Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936- Section 5 of this act affirmed Bigamy null and void or dissolved and imposes a penalty which has been laid down under Section 494 and 495 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Christian Divorce Act, 1896- This act does not provide a specific law for bigamy but at the time of registration of marriage, Section 60 lays down that none of the parties to the marriage should have been in an existing marriage and if a person gives a fall oath or declaration, then he/ she is punishable under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code. This provision explains that under this Act, more than one marriage is considered to be illegal.

Special Marriage Act, 1954- Section 44 of this Act lays down that if any person commits bigamy then he/ she is liable under Section 494 and 495 of the IPC, 1860.

Foreign Marriage Act 1969- Section 19 of this act states the punishment for Bigamy and imposes a penalty under Sections 494 and 495 of the Indian Penal Code.

Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995 AIR 1531 SC): The Supreme Court of India in its landmark judgment held that “where any man (not Muslim initially) converts his religion into Islam for the sole purpose of contracting a second marriage without legally divorcing his first wife ), the marriage shall be regarded as void and illegal and he shall be punished in the similar manner as he would have been punished had he not converted his religion.”

Bigamy shall not apply if:

a) the first husband or wife is dead, or

b) the first marriage has been declared void by the Court of competent jurisdiction, or

c) the first marriage has been dissolved by divorce, or

d) the first spouse has been absent or not heard of continually for a space of seven years. The party marrying must inform the person with whom he or she marries of this fact.

Read More

References:

1) Rights of the second wife in India

2) Is Bigamy a Punishable Offence in India?

3) BIGAMY LAWS FAQ

Salient features of conventions for elimination of all forms of discrimination against women:

 

Article 1 of the CEDAW defines discrimination against women as follows:

Any distinction, exclusion or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the effect or purpose of impairing or nullifying the recognition, enjoyment or exercise by women, irrespective of their marital status, on a basis of equality of men and women, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural, civil or any other field.

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), human rights treaty adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1979 that defines discrimination against women and commits signatory countries to take steps toward ending it.

The convention, which is also known as the International Bill of Rights for Women, consists of 30 articles and includes an optional protocol (OP). Human rights agreements often include OPs to provide an alternative mechanism to hold governments accountable or to further elaborate on any substantive topic within the treaty itself.

The rights listed in the Convention for Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) cover many aspects of women’s lives and relate to political participation, health, education, employment, housing, marriage, family relations, and equality before the law.

Under CEDAW, governments are also responsible for ensuring that individual citizens and private organisations do not discriminate against women.

The CEDAW requires both substantive and formal equality, non-discrimination, and empowerment of women, therefore recognizes that formal equality alone is insufficient for a state to meet its obligation and requires measures to address both direct and indirect discrimination to achieve substantive equality between men and women.

CEDAW provides for the right to education of females, protect the reproductive right, sex trafficking and exploitation; political and civil rights, such as the right to vote; health, employment, and marriage; and specific issues affecting rural women, such as access to agricultural credit and loans.

The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW Committee) is the international body charged with monitoring the implementation of the legal obligations of the 189 States parties under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (the CEDAW).

The CEDAW Committee monitors the progress made by the countries, which have ratified or acceded to the convention, in implementing CEDAW.

The CEDAW Committee is made up of 23 independent elected members (elected by countries who have signed CEDAW) who serve in their personal capacity as ‘gender experts.’

The CEDAW Committee meets three times a year to address specific topics related to CEDAW and to monitor and report on the progress of individual countries that have signed CEDAW.

Countries that have signed CEDAW are required to submit reports to the CEDAW Committee at least every four years.

Thus it can be concluded that CEDAW is the convention that enables feminist jurisprudence in the 189 countries that signed the convention. There is a CEDAW committee that monitors the implementation of measures taken to enforce the CEDAW provisions. This convention not only provides for the discrimination of women but also heinous crimes against women, such as trafficking, sexual violence, etc.

Read More

References:

1) Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)

2) Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women

3) The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women(CEDAW): Sex Discrimination - International Activities

Tuesday 26 April 2022

What do you understand by outraging the modesty of a woman?

Outraging the modesty of a woman:

Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code provides definition and punishment for the outraging the modesty of a woman. The said section reads as follows:

354. Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty.-

Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby outrage her modesty, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to fine.

Outraging the modesty of a woman is an offence provided there is use of assault or criminal force with the intention for the purpose or knowing it likely that he will thereby outrage her modesty. The offence under this section is different from rape and is of less seriousness than the one under Section 376.

It has been made a non-bailable offence under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013.

Ingredients

The section has two main ingredients:

(i) Assault or use of criminal force to a woman. The act on his behalf must be an outcome of the criminal force or an assault used by him.

(ii) Intention of the actor or his knowledge that he would thereby commit this offence. From the side of an accused, section 354 requires basic knowledge on his part that his act is likely to cause harm to a woman's modesty.

Outraging the modesty

In ordinary language "modest" means freedom from conceit or vanity or propriety in dress, speech and conduct. Modesty means sexual dignity of a woman which is acquired by her since the time of her birth. Modesty is defined as something lewd or scrupulously chaste as per the Oxford dictionary. The Supreme Court defined, the essence of a woman’s modesty is her sex.

The word "outrage" has affinity with extremely rude, violent, injurious or insulting act on one hand and it is connected with guilt, culpability, criminality and deviation from rectitude on the part of the person committing assault or using criminal force on a woman. The word ‘outrage’ implies a physical act.

The concept of modesty is subjective to every woman i.e. the sexual limits are personal to every woman; there cannot be a set formula to judge the boundaries of the sexual honour of a woman.  For example, a simple touch on the shoulder might be unacceptable to a woman who lives in a rural area but for a woman in an urban area it could be a casual gesture to greet people. However, there are certain acts which are bound to violate the modesty of every woman and these are the concerns of law, e.g. touching on her posterior sexual organs etc.

Herein, the modesty of a woman is violated by touching her without her consent at such parts of her body which are unacceptable to her. The reaction of the woman is not very relevant in judging as to whether an assault to her amount to outraging her modesty as this offence differs from woman to woman. The ultimate test for ascertaining whether modesty has been outraged is whether the act by the accused is capable of shocking the sense of decency of the woman.

Examples- include demand for disrobing her, defamatory remarks, forcefully dragging her to commit sexual assault and not limited to voyeurism are acts that would come under the ambit of outraging the modesty of a female.

Insulting Modesty

The word ‘insult’ refers to a situation where a woman is made to feel ashamed of her sexual dignity i.e. lowering the sexual honour of a woman in her own eyes. It may be done by passing sexual obscene remarks or making such gestures, sounds or showing sexual objects to her.

The modesty of a woman is insulted without actually touching her but by uttering any word, making any sound or gesture or exhibiting any object which has a sexual connotation with the intention that it be heard, seen or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman. If a person with an object to insulting the modesty of a woman exposes private parts of his body to her or uses obscene words or exhibits obscene drawings he shall be liable for the offence of insulting the modesty of a woman. However, the offender himself doesn’t need to personally exhibit the object; he may employ an agent for the same.

 

Read More

 

References:

1) Outraging modesty of a woman [S. 354]

2) Sexual Offences in IPC: Outraging Modesty, Disrobing, Voyeurism, and Stalking

3) Case study on outraging modesty of women

 

 

What are the main features of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act?


The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act (for short ITPA) was Act no. 104 of 1956 and it was enacted on Dt. 30.12.1956. The long title of the ITPA is, “An Act to provide in pursuance of the International Convention signed at New York on the 9th day of May, 1950, for the Prevention of Immoral Traffic.” It is evident from the long title that the ITPA is enacted in pursuance of the International Convention for the Prevention of Immoral Traffic, New York, signed on Dt. 9.05.1950.

The ITPA extends to whole India.

According to ITPA any person who is keeping and/or managing a brothel is liable for the punishment of rigorous punishment for 1 to 3 years with a fine upto Rs. 2,000/- (Two thousands only). If such person is again convicted for the same crime then the rigorous imprisonment term may be 2 to 5 years with a fine upto Rs. 2,000/- (Teo thousands only).

If a major (completed 18 years of age) person is living on the earning of prostitution then such person may be punished with imprisonment of a term upto 2 years and/or a fine upto 1,000/- (One thousands only). And if such prostitute is a minor, then the person who is living on her/his earning will be punishable for imprisonment of a term of 7 to 10 years.

Further the ITPA provides the punishment for procurement, inducement or taking a person for sake of prostitution which is rigorous imprisonment 3 to 7 years with a fine upto Rs. 2,000/- (Two thousands only). And if such act of the convicted person is against the will of the person then the punishment will be rigorous imprisonment of 14 years.

This Act provides for the appointment of special police officer and advisory body for dealing the offenses under the Act.

Offenses under ITPA are cognizable offenses. Also search of such premises where brothel is continued can be done without search warrant due to the provisions of the IPTA Act.

This act provides for the establishment of protect home for removed and rescued persons from such heinous trafficking. Also how such protect homes should maintain their records is provided under ITPA.

Only Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class can try the offenses under the ITPA.

State governments and Central government are empowered to establish the special courts for imparting the justice in the cases covered under this Act. State governments are empowered to formulate the rules and regulations under this Act for proper implementation of the Act and such rules are published in the official gazette of the State.

The ITPA provides for the prevention of the trafficking of humans for illicit purpose of prostitution and brothel. Both are the heinous acts which are destroying the ethics of the humanity. In general in such businesses women are forcefully thrown and they are forced to lose their dignity and modesty.

Reference:

TheImmoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act, 1956.

 

Sunday 20 February 2022

An act in law

Vande Matram! This article is about General Clauses Act, 1897. This is the basis of the Interpretation of the statute.

(2) “act”, used with reference to an offence or a civil wrong, shall include a series of acts, and words which refer to acts done extend also to illegal omissions;

Short Q and A:

·         What do you mean by an ‘act’ in law?

o   As per the General Clauses Act, 1860 the meaning of the act is used with to an offence or a civil wrong.

·         What is included in ‘act’ when it is used in law?

o   An ‘act’ includes an offence or a civil wrong.

o   There may be a series of offences or civil wrongs included in the term ‘act’.

o   Also illegal omissions are included in the term ‘act’.


 

To know references used for this article and other articles related to this topic please:

Read More.

=============

Abetment

Vande Matram! This article is about General Clauses Act, 1897. This is the basis of the Interpretation of the statute.

Bare Act:

Let us read the general definition of 'abet' as per General Clauses Act, 1897:

GENERAL DEFINITIONS

1[3. Definitions.—In this Act, and in all Central Acts and Regulations made after the commencement of this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,—

(1) “abet”, with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, shall have the same meaning as in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860);

Thus Section 3(1) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 provides us that the term 'abet' shall be interpreted with its various grammatical variations and cognate expressions as per the meaning given in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).

Meaning of “abet” as per Indian Penal Code:

Chapter 5 of IPC deals with offences relating to abetment.

Abetment basically means the action of instigating, encouraging or promoting a person into committing an offence. It can also mean aiding the offender while he is committing a crime.

The definition of abetment under Section 107, IPC requires a person to abet the commission of an offence.

Short Q and A:

·         What is the extent of definitions given in the General Clauses Act, 1897?

o   Definitions given in the General Clauses Act, 1897 is having extent to all Central Acts and Regulations made after the enactment of this Act.

·         What is the meaning of ‘abet’ in the General Clauses Act, 1897?

o   In the purview of the General Clauses Act, 1897 the meaning of abet with all its all grammatical variations and cognate expressions, shall have the same meaning as in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

·         What is the meaning of ‘abet’?

o   The term ‘abet’ is a verb having meaning ‘encourage or assist (someone) to do something wrong, in particular, to commit a crime and encourage or assist someone to commit (a crime)’.


To know references used for this article and other articles related to this topic please:

Read More.

=============