Friday, 17 July 2020
Short Q n A: High voltage AC circuit breakers - 1
Wednesday, 1 July 2020
Inter Alia
Image Credit: depositphotos.com
1. Inter Alia is a Latin phrase for "among other things."
2. The phrase inter alia is used in sentences in place of the phrase “among other things,” to indicate that what is being discussed is just one of a number of items or possibilities.
3. You use inter alia, meaning 'among other things', when you want to say that there are other things involved apart from the one you are mentioning.
4. This phrase is often found in legal pleadings and writings to specify one example out of many possibilities. Example: "The judge said, inter alia, that the time to file the action had passed."
5. This phrase is used in Pleading to designate that a particular statute set out therein is only a part of the statute that is relevant to the facts of the lawsuit and not the entire statute.
6. Inter alia is also used when reporting court decisions to indicate that there were other rulings made by the court but only a particular holding of the case is cited.
7. It is used to indicate that something is one out of a number of possibilities. For example, "he filed suit against respondents in state court, alleging, inter alia, a breach of contract."
8. It was very firstly used in 1665.
Monday, 22 June 2020
Short Q & A: Big data ecosystem.
Thanks for reading. On which subject you want notes - please comment. For more law notes please follow and share this blog.
Monday, 15 June 2020
Short Q & A: OECD
Tuesday, 9 June 2020
Short Q & A: Aadhaar Act
Monday, 8 June 2020
Short Q & A: Privacy
Thanks for reading. Please comment the subject on which you want notes. Please share and follow this blog for more law notes.
Saturday, 6 June 2020
Article 13 of COI
The State of Madras vs. Srimathi
Champakam:
Facts of the case: An order (known as the Communal G. O.) issued by the Province of Madras regarding to admission of students to the Engineering and Medical Colleges of the State which states that seats should be filled in by the selection committee strictly on the following basis, i.e., out of every 14 seats, 6 were to be allotted to Non-Brahmin (Hindus), 2 to Backward Hindus, 2 to Brahmins, 2 to Harijans. 1 to Anglo-Indians and Indian Christians and 1 to Muslims.
The court held that the Communal G.O. constituted a violation of the fundamental right guaranteed to citizens of India by Art. 29 (2) of the Constitution, namely, that "no citizen shall be denied admission to any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of the State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them” and was therefore void under Art. 13.