Statement of objects and reasons

Vande Matram! Interpretation of Statute is very important skill which every law professional must possess. Hence it is incorporated in the degree course of law. Let’s discuss how are the statements of objects and reasons of an enactment used to interpret a statute?

Statement of objects and reasons:

The statements of objects and reasons cannot be used as an aid to construction. The statements of object and reason are not admissible as an aid to construction of a statute. Objects and reasons of a statute are to be looked into as an external aid to find out the legislative intent, only when the language is obscure or ambiguous.

The Statement of Objects and Reasons, seeks only to explain what reasons induced the mover to introduce the bill in the House and what objects he sought to achieve. But those objects and reasons may or may not correspond to the objective which the majority of members had in view when they passed it into law. The Bill may have undergone radical changes during its passage through the House or Houses, and there is no guarantee that the reasons which led to its introduction and the objects thereby sought to be achieved have remained the same throughout till the Bill emerges from the House as an Act of the Legislature, for they do not form part of the Bill and are not voted upon by the members. The Statements of Objects and Reasons appended to the Bill should be ruled out as an aid to the construction of a statute.

Thanks for reading till the end. Please share this blog.

#InterpretationOfStatutes #StudyHelp #Notes #LawNotes #GeneralClausesAct #Bharat #India

List of Reference

Read More.

================

Parliamentary History – Facts and circumstances

Vande Matram! Interpretation of Statute is very important skill which every law professional must possess. Hence it is incorporated in the degree course of law. Let’s discuss how is the history of an enactment used to interpret a statute?

Parliamentary History – Facts and circumstances:

The surrounding circumstances and situations which led to the passing of the Act can be considered for the purpose of construing a statute. The Court has now veered to the view that legislative history within circumspect limits may be consulted by Courts in resolving ambiguities.

It has already been noticed that the Court is entitled to take into account “such external or historical facts as may be necessary to understand the subject-matter of the statute”, or to have regard to “the surrounding circumstances” which existed at the time of passing of the statute. Like any other external aid, the inferences from historical facts and surrounding circumstances must give way to the clear language employed in the enactment itself.

In order to arrive at the intention of the legislature, the state of law and judicial decisions antecedent to and at the time the statute was passed are material matters to be considered. Evidence of matters relating to such surrounding circumstances and historical investigation of which judicial note can be taken by court, including reports of select committees and statements of objects and reasons, can be resorted to for ascertaining such antecedent law and for determining the intention of the legislature.

Moreover, plain words in the statute cannot be limited by any considerations of policy. An erroneous assumption by the legislature as to the state of the law has no effect and would not become a substantive enactment. In the construction of a statute the worst person to construe it is the person who is responsible for its drafting. Courts sometimes make a distinction between legislative debates and reports of committees and treat the latter as a more reliable or satisfactory source of assistance. The speeches made by the members of the House in the course of the debate are not admissible as external aids to the interpretation of statutory provisions.

Thanks for reading till the end. Please share this blog.

#InterpretationOfStatutes #StudyHelp #Notes #LawNotes #GeneralClausesAct #Bharat #India

List of Reference

Read More.

================

External aids used for interpretation of statute

Vande Matram! Interpretation of Statute is very important skill which every law professional must possess. Hence it is incorporated in the degree course of law. Let’s discuss about external aids used to interpret a statute.

External aids used for interpretation of statute:

Other than the internal aid to interpretation which are part of a statute itself there are other aids which are not part of the statute. These are known as external aid to interpretation. The court can consider recourse outside the Act. Recourse to external aid is justified only to well-recognized limits.

Where the words of an Act are clear and unambiguous, no resource to extrinsic matter, even if it consists of the sources of the codification, is permissible. But where it is not so, the Court can consider, apart from the internal aids, the prior events leading up to the introduction of the Bill, and subsequent events from the time of its introduction until its final enactment like the legislation, history of the Bill, Select Committee reports, etc.

The history of legislation, the enactments which are repealed, the parliamentary debates, dictionary commentaries etc. are the external aids to construction. It is important to point out here that the legislature adopts the device of making a statute by “reference” and by “incorporation”. When the statute is incorporated in another statue by the legislature, the incorporated statute or statute referred to therein is external aid for interpreting the statute in question.

There has been a controversy in India regarding the use of parliamentary debates for interpreting the Constitution. It is now settled that the court can always refer to the debates in the legislature while interpreting the statute to know the intention if there is a doubt about the provision. More often than not, a provision is introduced in the Bill and after some debate either it is altered or modified or amended before finally it receives the assent of the President.

Where the Legislature has not chosen to define the expression the court of law have, therefore, to fall back upon other aids for finding the intention of the Legislature; for example by reference to the context and object and purpose of the legislative measure in question. The court may further have resort to dictionaries and judicial interpretation of this award as used in other statutes; but it cannot be denied that these methods are not as satisfactory as a precise and clear legislative definition in the statute itself.

Judgments:

B. Prabhakar Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh 1985 Suppl (2) SCR 573

In B. Prabhakar Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, the observations are:- "Where internal aids are not forthcoming, we can always have recourse to external aids to discover the object of the legislation. External aids are not ruled out. This is now a well settled principle of modern statutory construction. Thus 'Enacting History' is relevant: "The enacting history of an Act is the surrounding corpus of public knowledge relative to its introduction into Parliament as a Bill, and subsequent progress through, and ultimate passing by, Parliament. In particular it is the extrinsic material assumed to be within the contemplation of Parliament when it passed the Act." Again "In the period immediately following its enactment, the history of how enactment is regarded in the light of development from time to time."

Thanks for reading till the end. Please share this blog.

#InterpretationOfStatutes #StudyHelp #Notes #LawNotes #GeneralClausesAct #Bharat #India

List of Reference

Read More.

================

Internal aids for interpretation of statute

 Vande Matram! Interpretation of Statute is very important skill which every law professional must possess. Hence it is incorporated in the degree course of law. Let’s discuss about internal aids used to interpret a statute.

Internal aids for interpretation of statute:

The preamble, title, heading, marginal notes, punctuation, illustrations, definitions, proviso, explanation etc. are considered as internal aids for interpretation of statute. All these things are incorporated in a bare Act.

Preamble of the Act:

Preamble is a recital to the intent of the legislature as it enumerates the mischief to be remedied. By a long catena of decisions, it is now well settled that preamble is not a part of enactment. In India, it is well settled in the field of constitutional law that the preamble to the Constitution of India and Directive Principles of State Policy are the guidelines for interpreting the constitutional provisions.

Whenever there is a reasonable doubt about the provisions in the statute, it is permissible to refer to the heading of the provision for interpreting the section.

Marginal Notes:

Insofar as marginal notes inserted in the legislation itself are concerned, they are also treated as guidelines for interpreting the statutes. In the case of the Indian Constitution, the marginal notes have been enacted by the Constituent Assembly and hence they may be referred to for interpreting the Articles of the Constitution. If the words used in the enactment are clear and unambiguous, the marginal note cannot control the meaning, but in case of ambiguity or doubt, the marginal note may be referred.

Illustrations

In many statutes, especially, penal statutes, enacted in the olden times, it is the practice of the legislature to give illustrations. The illustrations cannot be used either to cut down or extend the scope of the section.

Long title and short title:

It is now settled that Long Title of an Act is a part of the Act and is admissible as an aid to its construction. The long title which often precedes the preamble must be distinguished with the short title. The long title is taken along with the preamble or even in its absence is a good guide regarding the object, scope or purpose of the Act. The short title being only an abbreviation for purposes of reference is not a useful aid to construction.

Headings:

The view is now settled that the Headings or Titles prefixed to section or group of sections can be referred to in construing an Act of the Legislature. But conflicting opinions have been expressed on the question as to what weight should be attached to the headings. Only in the case of ambiguity or doubt the heading or sub-heading may be referred to as an aid in construing the provision but even in such a case it could not be used for cutting down the wide application of the clear words used in the provision. The heading prefixed to section or sets of sections in some modern statutes are regarded as preambles to those sections. They cannot control the plain words of the statute but they may explain ambiguous words.

Punctuations

‘Punctuation’ means to mark with points and to make points with usual stops. It is the art of dividing sentences by point or mark. Punctuation is considered as a minor element in the construction of statutes. Text book writers comment that English Court pay little or no attention to punctuation while interpreting the statutes. The same is not the cases in Indian Courts. If a statute in question is found to be carefully punctuated, punctuation may be resorted for the purpose of construction.

Schedules:

Another important internal aid is the schedule or schedules appended to a statute. It forms part of the statute and it can be interpreted independently as well as with the aids of interpretation of statutory provision.

Illustrations:

Illustrations appended to a section form part of the statute and although forming no part of the section, are of relevance and value in the construction of the text of the section and they should not be readily rejected as repugnant to the section.

It would be the very last resort of construction to make this assumption. The great usefulness of the Illustrations which have, although not part of the sections, been expressly furnished by the Legislature as helpful in the working and application of the statute should not be thus impaired.

Definitions or interpretation clauses:

Definitions in an Act are to be applied only when there is nothing repugnant in the subject or context, and this is so even if such a qualifying provision is not expressly stated by the legislature. The definition must ordinarily determine the application of the word or phrase defined; but the definition itself must first be interpreted before it is applied. When the definition of a word gives it an extended meaning, the word is not to be interpreted by its extended meaning every time it is used, for the meaning ultimately depends on the context; and a definition clause does not, ordinarily enlarge the scope of the Act.

Proviso:

As a general rule, a proviso is added to an enactment to qualify or create an exception to what is in the enactment and ordinarily, a proviso is not interpreted as stating a general rule.

The proviso is subordinate to the main section. A proviso does not enlarge an enactment except for compelling reasons. Sometimes an unnecessary proviso is inserted by way of abundant caution. A proviso may sometimes contain a substantive provision.

Explanation:

It does not ordinarily enlarge the scope of the original section which it explains, but only makes the meaning clear beyond dispute.

Non-obstante clause:

A section sometimes begins with the phrase ‘notwithstanding anything contained etc.’ Such a clause is called a non obstante clause and its general purpose is to give the provision contained in the non obstante clause an overriding effect in the event of a conflict between it and the rest of the section.

Thanks for reading till the end. Please share this blog.

#InterpretationOfStatutes #StudyHelp #Notes #LawNotes #GeneralClausesAct #Bharat #India

List of Reference

Read More.

================

Schedules

 Vande Matram! Interpretation of Statute is very important skill which every law professional must possess. Hence it is incorporated in the degree course of law. Let’s discuss use of Schedules in interpretation of statutes.

Schedules:

Another important internal aid is the schedule or schedules appended to a statute. It forms part of the statute and it can be interpreted independently as well as with the aids of interpretation of statutory provision.

Schedules form part of a statute. They are at the end and contain minute details for working out the provisions of the express enactment. The expression in the schedule cannot override the provisions of the express enactment.

If the Act says that the schedule is to be used for a certain purpose and the heading of the part of the schedule in question shows that it is prima facie at any rate devoted to that purpose, then the Act and the schedule must be read as if the schedule were operating for that purpose only. If the language of a clause in the schedule can be satisfied without extending it beyond for a certain purpose, in spite of that, if the language of the schedule has in its words and terms that go clearly outside the purpose, the effect must be given by them and they must not be treated as limited by the heading of the part of the schedule or by the purpose mentioned in the Act for which the schedule is prima facie to be used. One cannot refuse to give effect to clear words simply because prima facie they seem to be limited by the heading of the schedule and the definition of the purpose of the schedule contained in the Act.

In Ramchand Textile v. Sales Tax Officer, A.I.R. 1961, All. 24, the Allahabad High Court has held that, if there is any appearance of inconsistency between the schedule and the enactment, the enactment shall prevail. If the enacting part and the schedule cannot be made to correspond, the latter must yield to the former.

Thanks for reading till the end. Please share this blog.

#InterpretationOfStatutes #StudyHelp #Notes #LawNotes #GeneralClausesAct #Bharat #India

List of Reference

Read More.

================

Non-obstante clause

Vande Matram! Interpretation of Statute is very important skill which every law professional must possess. Hence it is incorporated in the degree course of law. Let’s discuss how is non-obstante clause useful in interpretation of statute and its construction?

Non-obstante clause:

A section sometimes begins with the phrase ‘notwithstanding anything contained etc.’ Such a clause is called a non obstante clause and its general purpose is to give the provision contained in the non obstante clause an overriding effect in the event of a conflict between it and the rest of the section. Thus, there is generally a close relation between the non obstante clause and the main section and in case of ambiguity the non obstante clause may throw light on the scope and ambit of the rest of the section. If, however, the enacting part is clear and unambiguous, its scope cannot be whittled down by the use of the non obstante clause.

This phrase i.e. ‘notwithstanding anything in’ is in contradiction to the phrase ‘subject to’.

Judgments:

Aswini Kumar v. Arabinda Bose 1953 SCR 1 : AIR 1952 SC 369 : 1952 SCJ 568

The Supreme Court observed that: “the non obstante clause can reasonably be read as overriding ‘anything contained’ in any relevant existing law which is inconsistent with the new enactment, although the draftsman had primarily in his mind a particular type of law as conflicting with the new Act. The enacting part of a statue must, where it is clear, be taken to control the non obstante clause where both cannot be read harmoniously; for, even apart from such a clause, a later law abrogates earlier laws clearly inconsistent with it. While it may be true that the non obstante clause need not necessarily be co-extensive with the operative part, there can be no doubt that ordinarily there should be a close approximation between the two.”

 It was further observed that: “It should first be ascertained what the enacting part of the section provides on a fair construction of the words used according to their natural and ordinary meaning, and the non obstante clause is to be understood as operating to set aside as no longer valid anything contained in relevant existing laws which is inconsistent with the new enactment.”

Kanwar Raj v. Pramod [1955] 2 SCR 977 : AIR 1956 SC 105 : 1956 SCJ 134

It was held: The operative portion of the section which confers power on the Custodian to cancel a lease or vary the terms thereof is unqualified and absolute, and that power cannot be abridged by reference to the provision that it could be exercised ‘notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force.’ This provision is obviously intended to repel statutes conferring rights or leases, and cannot prevail as against them and has been inserted ‘ex abundant cautela’. It cannot be construed as cutting down the plain meaning of the operative portion of the section.

The enacting part of a statute must, where it is clear, be taken to control the non obstante clause where both cannot be read harmoniously; for even apart from such clause, a later law abrogates earlier laws clearly inconsistent with it.

Thanks for reading till the end. Please share this blog.

#InterpretationOfStatutes #StudyHelp #Notes #LawNotes #GeneralClausesAct #Bharat #India

List of Reference

Read More.

================

Explanation

Vande Matram! Interpretation of Statute is very important skill which every law professional must possess. Hence it is incorporated in the degree course of law. Let’s discuss how is explanation useful in interpretation of statute and its construction?

Explanation:

IN certain provisions of an Act explanations may be needed when doubts arise as to the meaning of the particular section. Explanations are given at the end of each section and it is part and parcel of the enactment.

The object of an Explanation to a statutory provision is-

(a) to explanation the meaning and intendment of the Act itself,

(b) where there is any obscurity or vagueness in the main enactment, to clarify the same so as to make it consistent with the dominant object which it seems to subserve,

(c) to provide an additional support to the dominant object of the Act in order to make it meaningful and purposeful,

(d) an Explanation cannot in any way interfere with or change the enactment or any part thereof but where some gap is left which is relevant for the purpose of the Explanation, in order to suppress the mischief and advance the object of the Act it can help or assist the court in interpreting the true purport and intendment of the enactment, and

(e) it cannot, however, take away a statutory right with which any person under a statute has been clothed or set at naught the working of an Act by becoming an hindrance in the interpretation of the same.

It does not ordinarily enlarge the scope of the original section which it explains, but only makes the meaning clear beyond dispute.

An explanation, normally, should be so read as to harmonise with and clear up any ambiguity in the main section and should not be so construed as to widen the ambit of the section. It is also possible that an explanation may have been added ex abundanti cautela to allay groundless apprehension.

Thanks for reading till the end. Please share this blog.

#InterpretationOfStatutes #StudyHelp #Notes #LawNotes #GeneralClausesAct #Bharat #India

List of Reference

Read More.

================