Tuesday, 19 May 2020

Fun facts about Law of Human Society

Skin Fun Facts | Forefront Dermatology
Image Credit: forefrontdermatology.com

Hello friends. In this article I am sharing some interesting one liner facts about history of Law in Human society. These are short notes which are helpful in describing the origin of law.

1) Ancient Egyptian law: Civil code written in 12 books long back in 22nd Century BC. It was based on the concept of Maat characterized by tradition rhetorical speech, social equality and impartiality.

2) Ur-nammu: Ur-nammu was an ancient Sumerian ruler. He formulated the first law code consisting of casuistic statements (if…then…”) during his era i.e. during 2100-2050 BC. This is known as Ur-nammu code and is written on tablets in Sumerian language.

3) Hammurabi: Around 1960 BC king Hammurabi further developed Babylonian law, by codifying and inscribing it in stone. Hammurabi placed several copies of his law code throughout the kingdom of Babylon as Stelae, for the entire public to see this became known as the codex Hammurabi.

4) India: The Arthashastra, dating from the 400 BC and the Manusmriti from 100 BCE were influential treatises in India, but this Hindu tradition, along with Islamic law was supplanted by the common law when India became part of British Empire. Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore and Hongkong also adopted the common law. 

5) Japan: Japan was the first country to begin modernizing its legal system along western lines by importing bits of the French but mostly the German Civil Code. 

6) China: Similarly traditional Chinese law gave way to westernization towards the final years of the dynasty in the form of six private law codes based mainly on the Japanese modal of German law.

7) Islamic Law: One of the major legal systems developed during the Middle Ages was Islamic law and jurisprudence. During the classical period of Islamic law and jurisprudence “Hawala” and institution of law was an early informal transfer system which is mentioned in text of Islamic Jurisprudence as early as the 8th century. Hawala itself later influenced the development of the “Aval” in French civil law and Avallo in Italian law. 

8) Roman Law: Roman law was heavily influenced by Greek teachings.

Thanks for reading till the end. Please follow and share this blog for more law notes.

Section 23 of Indian Contract Act, 1872

Section 23 of Indian Contract Act 1872 deals with lawful objects and consideration and the said Section is reproduced below for ready reference.

Consideration Under Indian Contract Act 1872
Image Credit: www.legalbites.in

Statutory provision:
23. What considerations and objects are lawful and what not.-
The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless-
-it is forbidden by law; or
-is of such nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law; or
-is fraudulent; or
-involves or implies injury to the person or property of another or;
-the Court regards it as immoral, or opposed to public policy.
In each of these cases, the consideration or object of an agreement is said to be unlawful. Every agreement of which the object or consideration is unlawful is void.
Illustrations
(a) A agrees to sell his house to B for 10,000 rupees. Here B's promise to pay the sum of 10,000 rupees is the consideration for A's promise to sell the house, and A's promise to sell the house is the consideration for B's promise to pay the 10,000 rupees. These are lawful considerations.
(b) A promises to pay B 1,000 rupees at the end of six months, if C, who owes that sum to B, fails to pay it. B promises to grant time to C accordingly. Here the promise- of each party is the consideration for the promise of the other party and they are lawful considerations.
(c) A promises, for a certain sum paid to him by B, to make good to B the value of his ship if it is wrecked on a certain voyage. Here A's promise is the consideration for B's payment and B's payment is the consideration for A's promise and these are lawful considerations.
(d) A promises to maintain B's child and B promises to pay A 1,000 rupees yearly for the purpose. Here the promise of each party is the consideration for the promise of the' other party. They are lawful considerations.
(e) A, B and C enter into an agreement for the division among them of gains acquired, or- to be acquired, by them by fraud. The agreement is void, as its object is unlawful.
(f) A promises to obtain for B an employment in the public service, and B promises to pay 1,000 rupees to A. The agreement is void, as the consideration for it is unlawful.
(g) A, being agent for a landed proprietor, agrees for money, without the knowledge of his principal, to obtain for B a lease of land belonging to his principal. The agreement between A and B is void, as it implies a fraud by concealment, by A, on his principal.
(h) A promises B to drop a prosecution which he has instituted against B for robbery, and B promises to restore the value of the things taken. The agreement is void, as its object is unlawful.
(i) A's estate is sold for arrears of revenue under the provisions of an Act of the Legislature, by which the defaulter is prohibited from purchasing, the estate. B, upon an understanding with A, becomes the purchaser, and agrees to convey the estate to A upon receiving from him the price which B has paid. The agreement is void, as it renders the transaction, in effect a purchase by the defaulter, and would so defeat the object of the law.
(j) A, who is B's mukhtar, promises to exercise his influence, as such, with B in favour of C, and C promises to pay 1,000 rupees to A. The agreement is void, because it is immoral.
(k) A agrees to let her daughter to hire to B for concubinage. The agreement is void, because it is immoral, though the letting may not be punishable under the Indian Penal Code.

Thanks for reading. Please follow and subscribe this blog for more Law notes.

Monday, 18 May 2020

Introduction to Law

PPT - An Introduction to Law PowerPoint Presentation, free ...
Image Credit: www.slideserve.com

Law is Man made. It changes over time to accommodate the society's need. Law is not easy to define. Law consists of enforceable rule governing relationships among individuals and between individuals and their society. The term “Law’ denotes different kinds of rules and Principles. Law is an instrument which regulates human conduct/behaviour. Law means Justice, Morality, Reason, Order, and Righteous from the view point of the society. Law means Statutes, Acts, Rules, Regulations, Orders, and Ordinances from point of view of legislature. Law means Rules of court, Decrees, Judgment, Orders of courts, and Injunctions from the point of view of Judges. 

It is very difficult to state a single and accurate definition of the term "law" as it is a general term and has different connotations for different people. On the one hand a common man may think of law as a set of rules he has to obey on the other hand for a judge, it is nothing but a set of guiding principles to be applied in deciding the cases. Law is everywhere, if you examine the human being life, there is "Law of nature".

According to Thomas Jefferson: "The study of the law qualifies a man to be useful to himself, to his neighbours, and to the public."
The law is a set of general ideas. When these general ideas are applied, a judge cannot fit a case to suit a rule; he must fit (or find) a rule to suit the unique case at hand. And finally the judge must also supply legitimate reasons for his decisions.
When we look at the development of law, there are several things they have had a major influence. Some of the more important elements are customs, history, and logic.
The term law denotes different kinds of rules and principles. It is used in various senses. When we speak of the Law of a State, it is used to special and strict sense. Law is an instrument, which regulates the Human Conduct or behavior. The State with the help of law maintains law and order and ensures peace and social security. In simple words, law is a rule of human conduct imposed and enforced by the State. Thus the object or main purpose of law is to secure to all, justice and equality.
Law changes from region to region, religion to religion and from time to time as per the needs of the society. 
The law is subject to change with the change in society and also change in the Government / legislative through the amendments/Acts.
Generally the term law is used to mean three things:
First it is used to mean “legal order”. It represents the regime of adjusting relations, and ordering conduct by the systematic application of the force of organized political society.
Secondly, law means the whole body of legal Percepts which exists in a politically organized society.
Thirdly, law is used to mean all official control in a politically organized society. This lead to actual administration of Justice as contrasted with the authoritative material for the Guidance of Judicial action. Law in its narrowest or strict sense is the civil law or the law of the land.

Definition of Law:
Here are some definitions of Law stated by scholars.

1) Thomas Jefferson: "The study of the law qualifies a man to be useful to himself, to his neighbours, and to the public."

2) Austin: Law is command of sovereign.
John Austin (1790-1859) An English Jurists expounded the concept of analytical positivism, making law as a command of sovereign backed by sanction. He developed logically, a structure of legal system in which he gave no Place to values, morality, idealism and Justice.
According to Austin, a law, in the strict sense is a general command of the sovereign individual or the sovereign body. Issued to those in subjectivity and enforced by the physical power of the state. According to Austin “law is aggregate of rules set by men politically superior or sovereign to men as politically subject.”
Austin says, “A law is command which obliges a person or persons to a course of conduct.
Austin’s definition of law is subjected to criticism on the ground that it ignores completely the moral and ethical aspects of law and unduly Emphasized the imperative character of law.

3) Salmond: Law is the body of principles recognised and applied by the State in the administration of justice.
Salmond did not define the expression Justice. Keeton says what has been considered to be just at one time has frequently not been so considered at another. Dean Roscoe Pound has criticized the definition of Salmond as reducing law to a mass of isolated decisions and the law in that sense to be an organic whole. Further, it is criticized on the ground that Salmond’s definition applies only to lax law not to Statute. Despite criticism, Salmond’s definition is considered as the workable definition.

4) Blackstone: Law in its general and comprehensive sense, signifies a rule of action and is applied indiscriminately to all kinds of actions, whether animate or inanimate, rational or irrational.

5) Savigny: Law is not the product of direct legislation but is due to the silent growth of custom or the outcome of unformulated public or professional opinion. Also Law is not as body of rules set by a determinate authority but as rules consist partly of social habit and partly of experience.

6) Pound: Law is the body of principles recognised or enforced by public and regular tribunals in the administration of justice. Pound defines law as a social institution to satisfy social wants. He says law is a social engineering, which means that law is a instrument to balance between the competing or conflicting interests.

7) John Chipman Gray: the Law of the State or of any organized body of men is composed of the rules which the courts, that is the judicial organ of the body lays down for the determination of legal rights and duties.
Gray’s definition is criticized on the Ground that he is not concerned with the nature of law rather than its Purposes and Ends. Further it does not take into account the statute law.

8) Thomas Erskine Holland: Law is a General rule of external human action enforced by a political sovereign. Holland also measures or defines law with preference to sovereign devoid of moral, ethical or ideal elements which are foreign to law and Jurisprudence.

9) John Erskine: Law is the command of a sovereign, containing a common rule of life for his subjects and obliging them to obedience.

10) Hans Kelsan: According to Kelsan legal order is the hierarchy of the norms, every norm derives its validity from the superior norm and finally there is highest norm known as grundnorm.

11) H. L. A. Hart: Law is the combination of primary rules of obligations and secondary rules of recognition.

12) Ihering: law is the form of Guarantee of the conditions of life of society, assured by state’s power of constrain. He says law is a means to an end and end of the law is to serve its purpose which is social not individual.

13) Dias: Law consists largely of “ought” (normative) Propositions prescribing how people ought to behave the “ought” of laws are variously dictated by social, moral, economic, political and other purposes.

Origin of Law:


Thanks for reading till the end. Please follow and share this blog for more law notes.

Sunday, 17 May 2020

Short Q & A: Muslim Law 6


Q. What is another name of Ithna- Ashriyah school?
Ans. Imamiyah School

Image Credit: hbr.org

Q. Which school believed in Muta?
Ans. Ithna- Ashriyah school of Shia sect.

Q. What is Muta?
Ans. Muta means temporary marriage.

Q. What two further sects of Ithna- Ashriyah school?
Ans. Akbaris Sect and Usuli Sect

Q. Which sub-school follows a modern form of legal deductions and reasoning when there requires an interpretation?
Ans. Akbaris Sect of Ithna- Ashriyah school.

Q. The Khojas and Boharas of Bombay belong to which School?
Ans. The Ismaili

Q. What is Article 25 (1) of Constitution of India?
Ans. Article 25 (1) guarantees to every person the freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practice and propagate religion. Consequently, any person may accept any religion he likes or he may renounce his religion.

Q. What is conversion to Islam?
Ans. When a non-Muslim accepts Islam it is termed as “Conversion to Islam”.

Q. What are the requirements of Muslim law to be applicable on a person?
Ans. For the application of Muslim law it is not necessary that a Muslim should be a born Muslim, it is sufficient if he is a Muslim by profession or by conversion.

Q. When a marriage will dissolve immediately if the wife is non-Muslim?
Ans. As per Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 when a non-Muslim wife who had adopted Islam at the time of marriage or after marriage renounces her faith back to her original faith then such marriage stands dissolved immediately. e.g. A Hindu girl adopts Islam at the time of marriage or after marriage and then after some time she renounce her faith in Islam and re-embrace Hinduism then such marriage stands dissolved immediately.

Q. What will happen if a wife who is already Muslim renounce her faith in Islam?
Ans. As per Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939; if a wife who is already Muslim renounces her faith in Islam and embraces other faith, then such marriage will not dissolve until the period of iddat i.e. period of three month from such renunciation. If that woman remarries before iddat then she can be held for begamy.

Q. What is effect on marriage if a Muslim man renounces his faith in Islam?
Ans. If a husband renounces Islam, the marriage stands automatically dissolved.

Q. What will happen, if a Muslim wife remarries before iddat, when her husband renounces his faith in Islam?
Ans. If a husband renounces Islam, the marriage stands automatically dissolved. in this case, if his wife remarries even before the expiry of iddat, she will not be guilty of bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Thanks for reading. Please follow and share this blog for more such Short Q and A essential for your exams.

Saturday, 16 May 2020

The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 Section 1


nikah halala
Image Credit: www.indiatoday.in
The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937
1. Short title and extent.—
(1) This Act may be called the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.
(2) It extends to the whole of India [except the State of Jammu and Kashmir].
Explanation:
Extended to the Pondicherry by Act 26 of 1968, sec. 3 and Part I, subject to the modifications. Also some words are Substituted by the Act (48 of 1959), sec. 3 and Sch I, for certain words (w.e.f. 1-2-1960). Also the words “excluding the North-West Frontier Province” omitted by the Indian Independence (Adaptation of Central Acts and Ordinances) Order, 1948; because North-West Frontier Province is now included in Pakistan.
Muslim Personal Law Act 1937 was not applicable to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. In Bhaderwah it was found that Muslim women in Bhaderwah do not suffer as compared to Muslim women in other parts of India. Rate of talaq and polygamy is low among the Muslims of Jammu and Kashmir. The Muslims in Bhaderwah in particular and in Jammu and Kashmir are giving preference to female education and employment so that they will not suffer in future.
All the Muslims in India are governed by the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937. This law deals with marriage, succession, inheritance and charities among Muslims. But the word ‘Muslim’ is not defined in this Act. The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 deals with the circumstances in which Muslim women can obtain divorce and rights of Muslim women who have been divorced by their husbands and to provide for related matters.
We are using a short title as Shariat Act. This Act was enacted on 7th October 1937 during British Rule in India. Shariat Act and all other Acts governed by this Act are applicable in India where the parties are Muslims. There are only 6 Sections in the Shariat Act. It aims at restoring the law of Islam to all Muslim communities residing in India. All customs contrary to the Shariat are void. The Shariat Act is applicable to Shia and Sunni sects and all the respective sub-sects in Muslim community. If any act includes any provisions that might be in contradiction to the spirit of this act, it will still stand.
Shariat Act is applicable to all properties. But it is not applicable to agricultural land. These laws are not applicable in Goa state, where the Goa Civil Code is applicable for all persons irrespective of religion. These laws are not applicable to Muslims who married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
(Note: The words in Red colour are taken as they are in the Shariat Act 1937.)
========

Thanks for reading till the end. Please share and follow this blog for more law notes.

Apostasy from Islam


Apostasy from Islam:

Prior to the passing of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 DMM Act, apostasy from Islam of either party to marriage operated as a complete and immediate dissolution of marriage ipso facto. Section 4 of the DMM Act provides:
“The renunciation of Islam by a married Muslim woman or her conversion to faith other than Islam shall not by itself operate to dissolve her marriage.”
After coming into operation of this provision the Law may be described thus –
1) Apostasy from Islam of husband operates as complete and immediate dissolution of marriage.
2) Apostasy from Islam of a married woman cannot by itself operate to dissolve the marriage, but she may file a suit for dissolution of her marriage on any of the grounds mentioned in Section 2 of the Act.
But where the woman was originally converted to Islam from some other faith, and now she re-embraces her former faith, the conversion will operate as dissolution of the marriage.
e.g. C, a Christian female becomes Muslim and marries a Muslim male in Nikah form. Later she converts to Christianity. The marriage is ipso facto dissolved because she has reverted back to her former faith. Had she, instead of reverting back to Christianity, converted to Hinduism, the marriage would not be ipso facto dissolved.

Image Credit: en.wikipedia.org

Rights of inheritance not affected by apostasy:

According to the provisions of pure Muslim law, a non-Muslim cannot succeed to the estate of Muslim. But this provision of law has been altered by the provisions contained in the Caste Disabilities Removal Act, 1850. The Act has now superseded the provisions of Muslim law to the effect that now non-Muslim relations are not debarred from inheriting to the property of Muslims. In other words, the result of the said Act is that the apostasy does not deprive a person who was once a Muslim of his right of inheritance or other rights.
Illustration – M a Muslim has two sons X and Y. X becomes Christian. Without making a will M dies surviving him Christian son X and Muslim son Y. Both will inherit half and half. But before the operation of the Caste Disabilities Removal Act, 1850; X could get nothing and Y would have taken the whole property.

Thanks for reading. Please share and follow this blog for more law notes.

Friday, 15 May 2020

Conversion to Islam in India


Conversion to Islam in India:

One of the fundamental rights guaranteed by our Constitution is “right to freedom of religion”. Article 25 (1) guarantees to every person the freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practice and propagate religion. Consequently, any person may accept any religion he likes or he may renounce his religion.
Religion is a very sensitive and personal aspect of individual's life and the constitution of India guarantees the freedom of conscience and religion to people of all denominations. Thus, a person is free to profess any faith or relinquish his faith of birth and convert to another religion.
When a non-Muslim accepts Islam it is termed as “Conversion to Islam”. For the application of Muslim law it is not necessary that a Muslim should be a born Muslim, it is sufficient if he is a Muslim by profession or by conversion. On conversion to Islam the convert subjects himself to the provisions of Muslim law. A man becomes a Muslim by making a confession of the unity of God and of the prophet hood of Muhammad, and so long as he does not renounce his faith in this, he remains a Muslim technically, or in spite of any opinion he may hold on any religious question, or any evil which he may commit or have committed, and a man who does not make this confession is a non-Muslim technically, in spite of any good that he may do.

Effect of Conversion to Islam on Marital rights:

The logic underlying the grant of relief in case of conversion is however, not merely a legal one, viz., that after conversion, the convert will be governed by different personal law, but also because conversion could mean a radical change in the personality of the convert. The event is often very much akin to a breakdown of the marriage and goes to the root of conjugal life of the spouses.
According to pure Muslim law a distinction is made between conversion to Islam of one of the spouses when such conversion takes place –
1) In a country subject to Muslim law: In this case, when one of the parties embraces Islam, he or she should invite his or her spouse to become Muslim. If that person does not do so, the Judge should dissolve the marriage.
2) In a country where the Muslim law is not the law of the land. The marriage is automatically dissolved after the lapse of a period of three months after the adoption of Islam by one of the spouses. This however is not the law in India.
Prior to the enactment of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 (DMMA), conversion of either spouse had the effect of automatic dissolution of the marriage under the Muslim personal Law.
But as per DMMA Act there is difference as follows:
a) A Muslim wife who was before her marriage a non-Muslim i.e. A wife who adopted Islam after marriage: In this case, the conversion of the wife would result in instant dissolution of the marriage. In other words, if a woman converts to Islam from some other faith and then re-embraces her former faith, then it will have the effect of immediate dissolution of her marriage. 
To take an example: a Muslim male marries a woman who was a Hindu prior to marriage but she Converts to Islam and gets married. After sometime, she renounces Islam and converts to Christianity. This will not ipso facto dissolve the marriage, because she has not re-embraced her former faith, viz., Hinduism. Had she re-embraced Hinduism, it would have had the effect of immediate dissolution of the marriage bond.
Munavvar-ul-Islam v. Rishu Arora
In Munavvar-ul-Islam v. Rishu Arora, a Hindu wife converted to Islam at the time of marriage. On her re-conversion back to her original faith viz Hinduism, her marriage stood dissolved. Her case falls under the second proviso to Section 4 of the Act, and the pre-existing Muslim Personal Law under which apostasy of either party to a marriage ipso facto dissolves the marriage, would apply.
b) A wife who was a Muslim before marriage i.e. A wife who was already Muslim:
In the case of a Muslim married woman, her renunciation of Islam or her conversion to a faith other than Islam shall not by itself operate to dissolve her marriage. Thus, if she remarries before the dissolution of her marriage, she can be prosecuted bigamy.
However, even after such reconciliation or conversion, the woman is entitled to obtain a decree for the dissolution of her marriage on any of the grounds mentioned in Section 2 of the Act, viz, unknown whereabouts of the husband, neglect, imprisonment of husband, failure to perform marital obligations, impotency, insanity, and cruelty. She can also exercise her option of puberty by repudiation of the marriage. The husband's apostasy is not a ground on which she may seek dissolution.
If a husband renounces Islam, the marriage stands automatically dissolved. Thus if his wife remarries even before the expiry of iddat, she will not be guilty of bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
In Abdul Ghani v/s Azizul Huq. A Muslim man and woman got married. After sometime, the husband embraced Christianity but reverted to Islam during the wife's iddat. Before the expiry of the iddat period, however, the wife got married to another man. The first husband thereupon filed a complaint against the wife, her father and her second husband under Section 494. It was held that no offence had been made.
Whatever view be taken of the uncertain status of the parties during the period of iddat and however illegal and void under Mohammedan law the second marriage of the woman during the period of iddat may be, there is no foundation for any charge under Section 494 of IPC against her. Her second marriage is not void by reason of its taking place during life of prior husband but by reason of special doctrine of the Mohammedan law of iddat with which the Indian Penal Code has nothing to do.