Thursday, 7 January 2021

Committee to report to High Court

 

Code of Civil Procedure Section

 

124. Committee to report to High Court.—Every Rule Committee shall make a report to the High Court established at the town at which it is constituted on any proposal to annul, alter or add to the rules in the First Schedule or to make new rules, and before making any rules under section 122 the High Court shall take such report into consideration.

 

Code of Civil Procedure Section

Constitution of Rules Committees in certain States

 

Code of Civil Procedure Section

 

123. Constitution of Rules Committees in certain States.—(1) A Committee, to be called the Rule Committee, shall be constituted at 1[the town which is the usual place of sitting of each of the High Courts 2*** referred to in section 122].

(2) Each such Committee shall consist of the following persons, namely:—

(a) three Judges of the High Court established at the town at which such Committee is constituted, one of whom at least has served as a District Judge or 3*** a Divisional Judge for three years,

4[(b) two legal practitioners enrolled in that Court,]

5[(c) a Judge of a Civil Court subordinate to the High Court, 6***

7* * * * *

(3) The members of each Committee shall be appointed by the 8[High Court], which shall also nominate one of their number to be President:

9* * * * *

(4) Each member of any such Committee shall hold office for such period as may be prescribed by the 8[High Court] in this behalf; and whenever any member retires, resigns, dies or ceases reside in the State in which the Committee was constituted, or becomes incapable of acting as a member of the Committee, the said 8[High Court] may appoint another person to be a member in his stead.

(5) There shall be a secretary to each such Committee, who shall be appointed by the 8[High Court] and shall receive such remuneration as may be provided in this behalf 10[by the State Government].

Note: 1. Subs. by Act 13 of 1916, s. 2 and Sch., for “each of the towns of Calcutta, Madras, Bombay, Allahabad, Lahore and Rangoon”.

2. The words “and of the Chief Court” omitted by the Act 11 of 1923, s. 3 and the Second Schedule These words were again ins. by Act 32 of 1925, and subsequently omitted by the A.O. 1948.

3. The brackets and words “(in Burma)” rep. by Act 11 of 1923, s. 3 and the Second Schedule.

4. Subs. by Act 2 of 1951, s. 16, for clauses (b) and (c).

5. Clause (d) re-lettered as clause (c) by s. 16, ibid.

6. The word “and” omitted by Act 38 of 1978, s. 3 and the Second Schedule.

7. Clause (d) omitted by s. 3 and the Second Schedule, ibid.

8. Subs. by Act 104 of 1976, s. 44, for “Chief Justice or Chief Judge” (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

9. Proviso omitted by s. 44, ibid. (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

10. Subs. by the A.O. 1937, for “by the G.G. in C. or by the L.G., as the case may be”.

 

Code of Civil Procedure Section

Section 122. Power of certain High Courts to make rules

Code of Civil Procedure Section 121. Effect of rules in First Schedule.

Bare Act:

122. Power of certain High Courts to make rules.—1[High Courts 2[not being the Court of a Judicial Commissioner]] 3*** may, from time to time after previous publication, make rules regulating their own procedure and the procedure of the Civil Courts subjects to their superintendence, and may by such rules annul, alter or add to all or any of the rules in the First Schedule.

Note: 1. Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for “Courts which arc High Courts for the purposes of the Government of India Act, 1935”.

2. Subs. by the Adaptation of Laws (No. 2) Order, 1956, for “for Part A States and Part B States”. The words in italics were ins. by Act 2 of 1951, s. 15.

3. The words “and the Chief Court of Lower Burma” rep. by Act 11 of 1923, s. 3 and the Second Schedule.

Code of Civil Procedure Section 123. Constitution of Rule Committees in certain States.


Section 122 of the Code empowers the High Court to amend the Rules, i.e., the procedure laid down in the Orders and every High Court had amended the procedure from time to time making the amendments in the said Orders. 


Effect of rules in First Schedule

 

Code of Civil Procedure Section

 

PART X

RULES

121. Effect of rules in First Schedule.—The rules in a First Schedule shall have effect as if enacted in the body of this Code until annulled or altered in accordance with the provisions of this Part.

 

Code of Civil Procedure Section

Section 120: Provisions not applicable to High Court in original civil jurisdiction

Code of Civil Procedure 

120. Provisions not applicable to High Court in original civil jurisdiction.—(1) The following provisions shall not apply to the High Court in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction, namely, sections 16, 17 and 20.

1* * * * *

Note: 1. Sub-section (2) rep. by Act 3 of 1909, s. 127 and the Third Schedule.

Code of Civil Procedure 

Jurisdiction of courts and venue of suits

Jurisdiction means the authority by which a court has to decide matters that are brought before it for adjudication. The limit of this authority is imposed by charter, statute or commission. If no such limit is imposed or defined that the jurisdiction is said to be unlimited.

Limitation of jurisdiction of civil court is basically four kinds:

[1] Jurisdiction over the subject matter- to try certain matters by certain court is limited by statute (Ex. Small cause court- suit for money due under promissory note or a suit for price of work done)

[2] Place of suing or territorial jurisdiction – A territorial limit of jurisdiction for each court is fixed by Government.

[3] Jurisdiction over persons – All person of whatever nationality are subject to the jurisdiction of the country except foreign state.

[4] Pecuniary jurisdiction depending on pecuniary value of suit –There is no pecuniary jurisdiction of high court and district court.

Jurisdiction may be further classified: [a] Original jurisdiction [b] Appellate jurisdiction

Criminal and appellate jurisdiction- Supreme Court, High Courts and District courts have both original and appellate jurisdiction in various matter.


Unauthorised persons not to address Court

 

Code of Civil Procedure Section

 

119. Unauthorised persons not to address Court.—Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to authorise any person on behalf of another to address the Court in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction, or to examine witnesses, except where the Court shall have in the exercise of the power conferred by its charter authorized him so to do, or to interfere with the power of the High Court to make rules concerning advocates, vakils and attorneys.

 

Code of Civil Procedure Section

Execution of decree before ascertainment of costs

 

Code of Civil Procedure Section

 

118. Execution of decree before ascertainment of costs.—Where any such High Court considers it necessary that a decree passed in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction should be executed before the amount of the costs incurred in the suit can be ascertained by taxation, the Court may order that the decree shall be executed forthwith, except as to so much thereof as relates to the costs; and, as to so much thereof as relates to the costs, that the decree may be executed as soon as the amount of the costs shall be ascertained by taxation.

 

Code of Civil Procedure Section